Hornisher et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE LEARNED INTERMEDIARY DEFENSE re 47 Stipulation, filed by Patricia Hornisher, Charles Hornisher, Eli Lilly and Company, Smithkline Beecham Corp. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/10/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware James M. Wood (State Bar Number 58679) James M. Neudecker (State Bar Number 221657) REED SMITH LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105 E-mail: jmwood@reedsmith.com E-mail: jneudecker@reedsmith.com Telephone: Facsimile: 415.543.8700 415.391.8269 Attorneys for Defendant Eli Lilly and Company, a corporation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) CHARLES HORNISHER and PATRICIA HORNISHER, Individually and as Personal Representatives of the Estate of ERIC JOHN HORNISHER, Deceased, Plaintiffs, vs. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP. d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE and JOHN DOES 1-50, Defendants. Case No. CV 09-01453 PJH Before the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE LEARNED INTERMEDIARY DEFENSE Complaint Filed: Trial Date: April 02, 2009 June 6, 2011 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 REED SMITH LLP ­1­ [Proposed] Order Extending Briefing Schedule For Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment On The Learned Intermediary Defense 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware Having the considered the parties' "Stipulation Requesting Extended Briefing Schedule for Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on the Learned Intermediary Defense," and good cause appearing, the Court orders that: 1. The deadline for Defendants to file a joint motion for summary judgment based on the learned intermediary defense is continued to January 11, 2010. 2. Plaintiffs' opposition brief and Defendants' reply brief shall be filed and served in accordance with Local Rules 56-1, 7-2 and 7-3. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. Any party may seek an extension of these deadlines for good cause. REED SMITH LLP IT IS SO ORDERED 12/10/09 DATED: __________. UNIT ED ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S ER N F D IS T IC T O R ­2­ [Proposed] Order Extending Briefing Schedule For Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment On The Learned Intermediary Defense A C LI US_ACTIVE-102786460.1 FO H hy is J. The Honorable PhyllisPJ. llHamilton Judge amilton R NIA IT IS S O ORD ERED NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?