Big Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California

Filing 153

JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/1/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA, a Federally Recognized Indian Tribe, JUDGMENT Plaintiff, 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 No. C 09-1471 CW v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. ________________________________/ For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order of November 22, 2010 granting Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and 13 denying Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, 14 15 16 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED That judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff Big Lagoon 17 Rancheria against Defendant State of California on its claim that 18 Defendant failed to negotiate with Plaintiff in good faith in 19 violation of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C. 20 §§ 2701, et seq., for a tribal-state compact between the parties 21 that would permit Plaintiff to conduct class III gaming, 22 That the Mediator shall inform the Secretary of the Interior 23 24 of his selection of a compact, triggering the Secretary’s duties 25 under 25 U.S.C. § 2710(d)(7)(B)(vii), provided, however, that the 26 Mediator shall stay notification of the Secretary of the Interior 27 pending further order of this Court, and 28 1 2 That the parties shall notify this Court immediately when their cross-appeals of the Order of November 22, 2010 are final. 3 4 5 Dated: 2/1/2012 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?