Big Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California
Filing
153
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/1/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
BIG LAGOON RANCHERIA, a Federally
Recognized Indian Tribe,
JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
No. C 09-1471 CW
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Defendant.
________________________________/
For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Order of November
22, 2010 granting Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and
13
denying Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment,
14
15
16
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
That judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff Big Lagoon
17
Rancheria against Defendant State of California on its claim that
18
Defendant failed to negotiate with Plaintiff in good faith in
19
violation of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C.
20
§§ 2701, et seq., for a tribal-state compact between the parties
21
that would permit Plaintiff to conduct class III gaming,
22
That the Mediator shall inform the Secretary of the Interior
23
24
of his selection of a compact, triggering the Secretary’s duties
25
under 25 U.S.C. § 2710(d)(7)(B)(vii), provided, however, that the
26
Mediator shall stay notification of the Secretary of the Interior
27
pending further order of this Court, and
28
1
2
That the parties shall notify this Court immediately when
their cross-appeals of the Order of November 22, 2010 are final.
3
4
5
Dated: 2/1/2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?