Chafford v. Hedgpetit

Filing 19

ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC re AMENDING 17 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, denying as moot 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File filed by Demetrius L. Chafford, granting 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Responsive Motion filed by Anthony Hedgpetit. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/23/10. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2010)

Chafford v. Hedgpetit

Doc. 19

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 vs. ANTHONY HEGPETH, Warden, Respondent. / DEMETRIUS LAGENE CHAFFORD, Petitioner, No. C 09-1574 PJH (PR) ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

This is a habeas case filed pro se by a state prisoner. In an order entered on January 15, 2010 (docket number 17), the court denied petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel and granted "[p]etitioner's motion for an extension of time to file his traverse." Petitioner's motion was, however, incorrectly identified as "document number 6," which in fact was a motion for an extension of time by respondent. The order (document 17) is AMENDED nunc pro tunc to show the number of petitioner's GRANTED motion of time to file his traverse as document eleven (document 11). His duplicate motion (document 10) is DENIED as moot. The traverse filed October 21, 2009, is timely. Respondent's motion for an extension of time to file an answer (document 6) is GRANTED. The answer is deemed timely. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 23, 2010. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge

P:\PRO-SE\PJH\HC.09\CHAFFORD1574.TRAV.wpd

Dockets.Justia.com