Moore et al v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al

Filing 140

ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 136 Motion for Leave to File (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2012)

Download PDF
Case4:09-cv-01823-SBA Document136-2 Filed08/17/12 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ROBIN L. MOORE FRANK M. GORMAN JAMES A. KOHM Division of Enforcement Bureau of Consumer Protection Federal Trade Commission 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Rm. M-8102B Washington, DC 20580 (202) 326-2167 (tel.) (Moore) (202) 326-2156 (tel.) (Gorman) (202) 326-2640 (tel.) (Kohm) (202) 326-2558 (fax) 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 DESIREE MOORE and KAREN JONES individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiffs, Case No. CV 09-1823 SBA XXXXXXXXXX PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AS AMICUS CURIAE vs. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., VERIZON CALIFORNIA, INC., VERIZON CORPORATE SERVICES GROUP INC., VERIZON SERVICES CORP., TELESECTOR RESOURCES GROUP, INC. d/b/a VERIZON SERVICES GROUP, VERIZON SERVICES OPERATIONS INC., VERIZON SERVICES ORGANIZATION, INC., VERIZON CORPORATE SERVICES CORP., VERIZON DATA SERVICES, INC., AND DOES 1 through 25, Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong Defendants. 24 25 26 Upon consideration of the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) Motion for Leave to File Brief as Amicus Curiae in this action, it is hereby ORDERED that: 27 28 1. the Motion is GRANTED; 1 Case4:09-cv-01823-SBA Document136-2 Filed08/17/12 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 2. the Clerk is directed to accept for filing the Commission’s Brief as Amicus Curiae; and 3. the Federal Trade Commission may appear at the Final Approval Hearing. 5 6 7 8/23/12 Dated:______ ______________________________ Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?