Hill v. R + L Carriers Inc

Filing 21

ORDER re 20 granting STIPULATION to Continue Deadline for Defendant R&L Carriers, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. Motion Hearing set for 10/22/2009 02:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/28/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4813-0794-7780.1 ROBERT S. NELSON (SBN# 220984) NELSON LAW GROUP 900 Cherry Avenue, Suite 300 San Bruno, CA 94066 (650) 794-2760 (phone) (650) 794-2761 (fax) rnelson@nelsonlawgroup.net Attorneys for Plaintiff GLENN HILL and all others similarly situated CHARLES O. THOMPSON, SBN 139841 MELYNNIE A. RIZVI, SBN 225591 KYLE L. SCHRINER, SBN 215853 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP One Sansome Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 362-2580 (phone) (415) 434-0882 (fax) rizvi@lbbslaw.com Attorneys for Defendants R+L CARRIERS, INC. and R+L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GLENN HILL, and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, Case No. C 09-01907 CW ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT R+L CARRIERS, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION Courtroom: 2 Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken R+L CARRIERS, INC., a corporation; R+L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC, a corporation, Defendant. -i- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8/28/09 Dated: _________________ TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page Good cause hereby appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED. The deadline for Defendant R+L Carriers, Inc. to file a Motion to Dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is hereby extended from August 27, 2009 to September 17, 2009. Motion to be noticed for hearing on October 22, 2009. ____________________________________ The Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?