Hill v. R + L Carriers Inc

Filing 326

CLERKS NOTICE DEEMING OBJECTION DENIED re 324 MOTION Relief from magistrate ruling [#314]. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2011)

1

IN THE UNIT
TED STATE DISTRI
ES
ICT COURT
T

2

FOR T
THE NORTH
HERN DIST
TRICT OF CALIFORN
NIA

3
4
5
6
7

Plaintiff
P
f,

CLERK’S NOTICE
E
DEEMIN OBJECT
NG
TION
DENIED
D

v.
R + L CARRI
IERS INC,
,

8
9

No. C 09-01907 CW
7

GLE
ENN HILL,
,

Defendant
D
t.
___
_________
_________
_________
______/

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

On Aug
gust 13, 2011, Pl
laintiff filed an objecti
n
ion to the

12

Mag
gistrate Judge’s order gr
ranting t
the motio to com
on
mpel filed on

13

Aug
gust 12, 2011.

14

Dis
strict Ju
udge may deny the objecti
e
ion by wr
ritten or
rder at any

15

tim
me, but may not g
m
grant it without first gi
iving the opposing party
e
y

16

Civil Loc
C
cal Rule 72-2 sta
ates, in part, “The

an opportun
nity to b
brief the matter.
e
.

If no order de
enying the

17
tion or setting a briefin schedu
s
ng
ule is ma
ade withi 14 days of
in
mot
18
19

the filing of the o
e
objection the ob
n,
bjection shall be deemed denied.
e

20

The Clerk shall not
e
s
tify part
ties when an obje
n
ection ha been deemed
as

21

den
nied.”

22

obj
jection to the Ma
t
agistrate Judge’s order, and the Court has not
e
s

23

iss
sued an order.
o

24

Fourteen days has passed since th filing of the
F
s
he
g

According
A
gly,

Notice is here
e
eby given that Pl
n
laintiff’ object
’s
tion is deemed

25
den
nied.
26
27
28

Dat
ted: 8/30/2011

Deputy Cl
D
lerk