Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc. et al

Filing 381

ORDER Granting #379 Stipulation on Briefing Schedule re 366 EA's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Responses due by 11/10/2011. Replies due by 11/17/2011. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 11/01/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Michael P. Lehmann (Cal. Bar No. 77152)
Jon T. King (Cal. Bar No. 205073)
HAUSFELD LLP
44 Montgomery Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel:
[phone]
Fax:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Plaintiffs' Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel
with Principal Responsibility for the
Antitrust Claims

Robert A. Van Nest (Cal. Bar No. 84065)
R. James Slaughter (Cal. Bar. 192813)
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Electronic Arts Inc.
[Add’l Counsel on Signature Page]

[Add’l Counsel on Signature Page]

10
11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

IN RE NCAA STUDENT-ATHLETE NAME
& LIKENESS LICENSING LITIGATION

Case No. 4:09-cv-1967 CW (NC)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE
FOR EA’S MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
Date:
Time:
Judge:
Courtroom:

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE
CASE No. 4:09-CV-1967-CW (NC)

December 8, 2011
2:00 p.m.
Hon. Claudia Wilken
2, Fourth Floor

WHEREAS, on October 13, 2011, Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. (“EA”) filed a “Motion for

1
2

Judgment on the Pleadings” (Dkt. 366) (the “Motion”) with respect to the Antitrust Plaintiffs’ claims

3

as set forth in the “Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint” (SCACAC”);

4

WHEREAS, the initial date for a hearing on the Motion was set for November 17, 2011;

5

WHEREAS, the Antitrust Plaintiffs’ opposition brief currently is due on Thursday, October

6

27, 2011, and EA’s reply brief is due on Thursday, November 3, 2011;

7
WHEREAS, on October 19, 2011 a Clerk’s Notice issued resetting the hearing date for

8
9
10

Thursday, December 8, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. and stating that “[t]he previous briefing schedule remains
in effect.“;

11
12
13

WHEREAS, counsel for the Antitrust Plaintiffs and EA have conferred and believe that a
short extension of the briefing dates is appropriate in view of the case developments described
below, and that the short proposed extension will not affect the hearing date;

14
WHEREAS, all parties including the Antitrust Plaintiffs and EA have been devoting
15
16
17

considerable attention to the Court-ordered mediation session occurring next week under the
guidance of the Hon. Judge Infante (Ret.);
WHEREAS, all parties have been devoting considerable attention to the approximately three

18
19

weeks’ worth of class representative depositions occurring in the first three weeks of November;

20
21

THEREFORE, it is SO STIPULATED that the Antitrust Plaintiffs’ opposition brief is due on
Thursday, November 10, 2011, and EA’s reply brief is due on Thursday, November 17, 2011, and

22
the hearing date set for Thursday, December 8, 2011 will remain unchanged.
23
24

//

25

//

26

//

27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE

-1-

1

Dated: October 27, 2011

Respectfully Submitted,

2
3

/s/ Jon T. King_____________________

/s/ R. James Slaughter_____________________

4

Michael P. Lehmann (Cal. Bar No. 77152
Jon T. King (Cal. Bar No. 205073)
HAUSFELD LLP
44 Montgomery Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel:
[phone]
Fax:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

Robert A. Van Nest
R. James Slaughter
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel:
[phone]
Fax:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Michael D. Hausfeld (pro hac vice)
HAUSFELD LLP
1700 K Street, NW, Suite 650
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Daniel M. Wall
Timothy L. O'Mara
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco CA 94111-6538
Tel:
[phone]
Fax : [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel
with Principal Responsibility for Antirust
Claims

Attorneys for Defendant
Electronic Arts Inc.

16
17
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED:
20
21
___________________________________
22
23

Hon. Claudia Wilken
United States District Court Judge

24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE

-2-

1

I, Jon T. King, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

2
3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR EA’S
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

4

In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that R. James Slaughter has

5

concurred in this filing.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE

-3-