Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc. et al
Filing
401
ORDER Granting #399 Stipulation re Addendum to Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/6/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)
1
[Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ Counsel
Listed on Signature Block]
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
OAKLAND DIVISION
10
11
IN RE NCAA STUDENT-ATHLETE
NAME & LIKENESS LICENSING
LITIGATION
12
Case No. 4:09-cv-1967 CW (NC)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE: ADDENDUM TO STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
13
14
CLASS ACTION
15
16
Complaint Filed: May 5, 2009
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM
TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-1967 CW (NC)
1
All parties, by their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to the following
2
proposed Addendum to the March 7, 2011 “Stipulated Protective Order Regarding
3
Confidentiality of Documents and Materials” (the “Stipulated Protective Order”) (Dkt. 320)
4
entered by the Court in this matter in order to address concerns of certain third party subpoena
5
recipients regarding information to be produced pursuant to subpoena or otherwise made
6
available in this litigation:
7
8
9
1.
This Addendum incorporates by reference all provisions of the Stipulated
Protective Order to the extent those provisions do not conflict with the provisions herein. Unless
10
otherwise defined herein, defined terms in the Stipulated Protective Order shall have the same
11
definitions in this Addendum.
12
13
2.
A producing party may designate as “Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” any
testimony, information, or document that is especially sensitive such that the producing party
14
believes in good faith that it would suffer competitive harm if publicly known or known by
15
16
17
18
agents and employees of other parties or non-parties who would have access under the Stipulated
Protective Order to Confidential Material.
3.
Designation of “Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material shall be made in the
19
same manner as designation of Confidential Material pursuant to Paragraphs (5), (6), (7) and (8)
20
of the Stipulated Protective Order.
21
4.
“Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material may be disclosed, summarized,
22
described, characterized, or otherwise communicated or made available in whole or in part by the
23
24
party to whom such materials are produced or disclosed only to the following persons, who shall
25
be bound thereby by the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order and this Addendum: (a) the
26
parties’ outside counsel and their legal, clerical, or support staff; (b) experts or consultants
27
retained by a party in connection with this action; (c) any person indicated on the face of a
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM
TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-1967 CW (NC)
1
document to be the author, addressee, or a copy recipient of the document; (d) the Court, Court
2
personnel, any juror or any court reporter employed in this action; and (e) any other person only
3
upon order of the Court after notice to the producing party or stipulation of the producing party.
4
“Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material shall not be disclosed to any person identified in
5
category (b) above until such person has been shown a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order
6
and this Addendum and has first agreed to be bound by the terms of the Stipulated Protective
7
8
Order and this Addendum by executing the Acknowledgment attached hereto as Exhibit A.
5.
9
A Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) witness or equivalent designated by a party or non-
10
party may be shown any material designated “Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” during the course
11
of his/her examination if (a) counsel for the examining party believes in good faith that such a
12
witness has a need to review such material, and (b) that witness is employed by the same entity,
13
including any subsidiary or affiliate thereof, as a person indicated on the face of such a document
14
to be the author, addressee, or a copy recipient.
15
6.
16
Any deponent or witness who currently is or at the time of the creation of the
17
relevant discovery material was employed by the producing party may be shown “Outside
18
Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material so designated by that producing party during the course of
19
his/her examination.
20
21
7.
Except as set forth in this Addendum, “Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material
shall be treated in the same manner as Confidential Material pursuant to the Stipulated Protective
22
Order.
23
24
//
25
//
26
//
27
//
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM
TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
2
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-1967 CW (NC)
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
2
Dated: December 6, 2011
3
HAUSFELD LLP
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
4
/s/ Jon T. King
Michael P. Lehmann (Cal. Bar No. 77152)
Jon T. King (Cal. Bar No. 205073)
Bruce J. Wecker (Cal. Bar No. 78530)
44 Montgomery Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: (415) 633-1908
Fax: (415) 358-4980
Email: mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com
jking@hausfeldllp.com
bwecker@hausfeldllp.com
/s/ R. James Slaughter
Robert A. Van Nest
R. James Slaughter
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (415) 391-5400
Fax: (415) 397-7188
Email: rvannest@kvn.com
rslaughter@kvn.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Michael D. Hausfeld (pro hac vice)
HAUSFELD LLP
1700 K Street, NW, Suite 650
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: (202) 540-7200
Fax: (202) 540-7201
Email: mhausfeld@hausfeldllp.com
/s/ Timothy L. O’Mara
______
Daniel M. Wall
Timothy L. O'Mara
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco CA 94111-6538
Tel: (415) 391-0600
Fax : (415) 395-8095
E-mail: dan.wall@lw.com
tim.omara@lw.com
Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel
with Principal Responsibility for Antirust
Claims
Attorneys for Defendant
Electronic Arts Inc.
19
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP
20
/s/
Robert B. Carey
Robert B. Carey (pro hac vice)
Leonard W. Aragon (pro hac vice)
11 West Jefferson
Suite 1000 Phoenix, AZ, 85003
Telephone: (602) 840-5900
Facsimile: (602) 840-3012
Email: rcarey@hbsslaw.com
leonard@hbsslaw.com
/s/
R. Charles Henn Jr.
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON
LLP
William H. Brewster (pro hac vice)
R. Charles Henn Jr. (pro hac vice)
Suite 2800
1100 Peachtree Street
Atlanta, GA 30309-4530
Telephone: (404) 815-6500
Facsimile: (404) 815-6555
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
Attorneys for Defendant College Licensing
Company
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM
TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
3
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-1967 CW (NC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice)
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, Washington 98101
Telephone: (206) 623-7292
Facsimile: (206) 623-0594
E-Mail: steve@hbsslaw.com
Plaintiffs' Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel
With Primary Responsibility for the
Right of Publicity Claims
7
8
9
10
MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND
STONE, P.L.C.
/s/
Gregory L. Curtner
Gregory L. Curtner (pro hac vice)
Robert J. Wierenga (SBN 183687)
Kimberly K. Kefalas (pro hac vice)
Kimberly L. Scott (pro hac vice)
Suzanne L. Wahl (pro hac vice)
101 North Main St., 7th Floor
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Telephone: (734) 663-2445
Facsimile: (734) 663-8624
Email: curtner@millercanfield.com
wierenga@millercanfield.com
kefalas@millercanfield.com
scott@millercanfield.com
wahl@millercanfield.com
11
Attorneys for Defendant
National Collegiate Athletic Association
12
13
14
15
IT SO ORDERED.
16
17
12/6/2011
Dated: ______________________________
________________________________
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
I, Jon T. King, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM TO STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER
24
In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Robert B. Carey, R.
25
Charles Henn Jr., Gregory L. Curtner, R. James Slaughter, and Timothy L. O’Mara, Jr. have
26
concurred in this filing.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM
TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
4
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-1967 CW (NC)
EXHIBIT A
1
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
2
I, ____________________________________________ [print or type full name], of
3
4
__________________________________________ [print or type full address], declare under
5
penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the “Stipulated Protective Order
6
Regarding Confidentiality of Documents and Materials” (the “Stipulated Protective Order”) that
7
8
9
was entered on March 7, 2011 by the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California in the case of In re Student-Athlete Name and Likeness Licensing Litigation., No. 09-
10
cv-1967 CW, and the “Stipulation and Order Re Addendum to Stipulated Protective Order” (the
11
“Addendum”) entered by the Court on _______________. I agree to comply with and to be
12
bound by all the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order and the Addendum, and I understand
13
and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the
14
nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or
15
16
item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order or the Addendum to any person or entity in
17
strict compliance with the provisions of the Stipulated Protective Order and the Addendum.
18
I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the
19
Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Stipulated Protective
20
Order and the Addendum, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this
21
action.
22
Date: ___________________________________
23
24
City and State where sworn and signed: __________________________________
25
Name: ___________________________________ [printed name]
26
Signature: ________________________________ [signature]
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM
TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
5
CASE NO. 4:09-CV-1967 CW (NC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?