Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc. et al

Filing 401

ORDER Granting 399 Stipulation re Addendum to Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/6/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2011)

Download PDF
1 [Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ Counsel Listed on Signature Block] 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 OAKLAND DIVISION 10 11 IN RE NCAA STUDENT-ATHLETE NAME & LIKENESS LICENSING LITIGATION 12 Case No. 4:09-cv-1967 CW (NC) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ADDENDUM TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 14 CLASS ACTION 15 16 Complaint Filed: May 5, 2009 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 4:09-CV-1967 CW (NC) 1 All parties, by their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate to the following 2 proposed Addendum to the March 7, 2011 “Stipulated Protective Order Regarding 3 Confidentiality of Documents and Materials” (the “Stipulated Protective Order”) (Dkt. 320) 4 entered by the Court in this matter in order to address concerns of certain third party subpoena 5 recipients regarding information to be produced pursuant to subpoena or otherwise made 6 available in this litigation: 7 8 9 1. This Addendum incorporates by reference all provisions of the Stipulated Protective Order to the extent those provisions do not conflict with the provisions herein. Unless 10 otherwise defined herein, defined terms in the Stipulated Protective Order shall have the same 11 definitions in this Addendum. 12 13 2. A producing party may designate as “Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” any testimony, information, or document that is especially sensitive such that the producing party 14 believes in good faith that it would suffer competitive harm if publicly known or known by 15 16 17 18 agents and employees of other parties or non-parties who would have access under the Stipulated Protective Order to Confidential Material. 3. Designation of “Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material shall be made in the 19 same manner as designation of Confidential Material pursuant to Paragraphs (5), (6), (7) and (8) 20 of the Stipulated Protective Order. 21 4. “Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material may be disclosed, summarized, 22 described, characterized, or otherwise communicated or made available in whole or in part by the 23 24 party to whom such materials are produced or disclosed only to the following persons, who shall 25 be bound thereby by the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order and this Addendum: (a) the 26 parties’ outside counsel and their legal, clerical, or support staff; (b) experts or consultants 27 retained by a party in connection with this action; (c) any person indicated on the face of a 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 CASE NO. 4:09-CV-1967 CW (NC) 1 document to be the author, addressee, or a copy recipient of the document; (d) the Court, Court 2 personnel, any juror or any court reporter employed in this action; and (e) any other person only 3 upon order of the Court after notice to the producing party or stipulation of the producing party. 4 “Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material shall not be disclosed to any person identified in 5 category (b) above until such person has been shown a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order 6 and this Addendum and has first agreed to be bound by the terms of the Stipulated Protective 7 8 Order and this Addendum by executing the Acknowledgment attached hereto as Exhibit A. 5. 9 A Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) witness or equivalent designated by a party or non- 10 party may be shown any material designated “Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” during the course 11 of his/her examination if (a) counsel for the examining party believes in good faith that such a 12 witness has a need to review such material, and (b) that witness is employed by the same entity, 13 including any subsidiary or affiliate thereof, as a person indicated on the face of such a document 14 to be the author, addressee, or a copy recipient. 15 6. 16 Any deponent or witness who currently is or at the time of the creation of the 17 relevant discovery material was employed by the producing party may be shown “Outside 18 Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material so designated by that producing party during the course of 19 his/her examination. 20 21 7. Except as set forth in this Addendum, “Outside Attorneys’ Eyes Only” material shall be treated in the same manner as Confidential Material pursuant to the Stipulated Protective 22 Order. 23 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2 CASE NO. 4:09-CV-1967 CW (NC) 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 2 Dated: December 6, 2011 3 HAUSFELD LLP KEKER & VAN NEST LLP 4 /s/ Jon T. King Michael P. Lehmann (Cal. Bar No. 77152) Jon T. King (Cal. Bar No. 205073) Bruce J. Wecker (Cal. Bar No. 78530) 44 Montgomery Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: (415) 633-1908 Fax: (415) 358-4980 Email: mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com jking@hausfeldllp.com bwecker@hausfeldllp.com /s/ R. James Slaughter Robert A. Van Nest R. James Slaughter 633 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 391-5400 Fax: (415) 397-7188 Email: rvannest@kvn.com rslaughter@kvn.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Michael D. Hausfeld (pro hac vice) HAUSFELD LLP 1700 K Street, NW, Suite 650 Washington, DC 20006 Tel: (202) 540-7200 Fax: (202) 540-7201 Email: mhausfeld@hausfeldllp.com /s/ Timothy L. O’Mara ______ Daniel M. Wall Timothy L. O'Mara 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco CA 94111-6538 Tel: (415) 391-0600 Fax : (415) 395-8095 E-mail: dan.wall@lw.com tim.omara@lw.com Plaintiffs’ Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel with Principal Responsibility for Antirust Claims Attorneys for Defendant Electronic Arts Inc. 19 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP 20 /s/ Robert B. Carey Robert B. Carey (pro hac vice) Leonard W. Aragon (pro hac vice) 11 West Jefferson Suite 1000 Phoenix, AZ, 85003 Telephone: (602) 840-5900 Facsimile: (602) 840-3012 Email: rcarey@hbsslaw.com leonard@hbsslaw.com /s/ R. Charles Henn Jr. KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP William H. Brewster (pro hac vice) R. Charles Henn Jr. (pro hac vice) Suite 2800 1100 Peachtree Street Atlanta, GA 30309-4530 Telephone: (404) 815-6500 Facsimile: (404) 815-6555 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 26 Attorneys for Defendant College Licensing Company 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 3 CASE NO. 4:09-CV-1967 CW (NC) 1 2 3 4 5 6 Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, Washington 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 E-Mail: steve@hbsslaw.com Plaintiffs' Interim Co-Lead Class Counsel With Primary Responsibility for the Right of Publicity Claims 7 8 9 10 MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND STONE, P.L.C. /s/ Gregory L. Curtner Gregory L. Curtner (pro hac vice) Robert J. Wierenga (SBN 183687) Kimberly K. Kefalas (pro hac vice) Kimberly L. Scott (pro hac vice) Suzanne L. Wahl (pro hac vice) 101 North Main St., 7th Floor Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Telephone: (734) 663-2445 Facsimile: (734) 663-8624 Email: curtner@millercanfield.com wierenga@millercanfield.com kefalas@millercanfield.com scott@millercanfield.com wahl@millercanfield.com 11 Attorneys for Defendant National Collegiate Athletic Association 12 13 14 15 IT SO ORDERED. 16 17 12/6/2011 Dated: ______________________________ ________________________________ The Honorable Claudia Wilken U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 I, Jon T. King, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 24 In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Robert B. Carey, R. 25 Charles Henn Jr., Gregory L. Curtner, R. James Slaughter, and Timothy L. O’Mara, Jr. have 26 concurred in this filing. 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 4 CASE NO. 4:09-CV-1967 CW (NC) EXHIBIT A 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 2 I, ____________________________________________ [print or type full name], of 3 4 __________________________________________ [print or type full address], declare under 5 penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the “Stipulated Protective Order 6 Regarding Confidentiality of Documents and Materials” (the “Stipulated Protective Order”) that 7 8 9 was entered on March 7, 2011 by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in the case of In re Student-Athlete Name and Likeness Licensing Litigation., No. 09- 10 cv-1967 CW, and the “Stipulation and Order Re Addendum to Stipulated Protective Order” (the 11 “Addendum”) entered by the Court on _______________. I agree to comply with and to be 12 bound by all the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order and the Addendum, and I understand 13 and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the 14 nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or 15 16 item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order or the Addendum to any person or entity in 17 strict compliance with the provisions of the Stipulated Protective Order and the Addendum. 18 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the 19 Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Stipulated Protective 20 Order and the Addendum, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this 21 action. 22 Date: ___________________________________ 23 24 City and State where sworn and signed: __________________________________ 25 Name: ___________________________________ [printed name] 26 Signature: ________________________________ [signature] 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE ADDENDUM TO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 5 CASE NO. 4:09-CV-1967 CW (NC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?