Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc. et al

Filing 487

ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE FROM NCAA AND THE BIG TEN NETWORK RE: #484 . Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 7/27/12. (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 10 11 IN RE NCAA STUDENT-ATHLETE NAME & LIKENESS LICENSING LITIGATION Case No. 09-cv-01967 CW (NC) Related to 11-mc-80300 CW (NC) 12-mc-80020 CW (NC) ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE FROM THE NCAA AND THE BIG TEN NETWORK 12 13 Re: Dkt. No. 484 14 15 16 17 Antitrust plaintiffs filed a motion to seal portions of documents produced and designated 18 as confidential by the NCAA and The Big Ten Network on July 17, 2012. Civil Local Rule 79- 19 5(d) requires the designating party to file within seven days of the sealing motion’s filing date a ` 20 declaration “establishing that the designated information is sealable, and must lodge and serve a 21 narrowly tailored proposed sealing order, or must withdraw the designation of confidentiality.” 22 Rule 79-5(d) further provides that “if the designating party does not file its responsive 23 declaration as required by this subsection, the document or proposed filing will be made part of 24 the public record.” More than seven days have passed since antitrust plaintiffs filed the sealing 25 motion, but neither the NCAA nor The Big Ten Network has filed a response in accordance 26 with Rule 79-5(d). Unless the NCAA or The Big Ten Network file such a response by July 30, 27 2012, the documents at issue will be made part of the public record. 28 // Case No. 09-cv-01967 CW (NC) ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 DATED: July 26, 2012 _____________________ Nathanael M. Cousins United States Magistrate Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 09-cv-01967 CW (NC) ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?