Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc. et al
Filing
487
ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE FROM NCAA AND THE BIG TEN NETWORK RE: #484 . Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 7/27/12. (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9
10
11
IN RE NCAA STUDENT-ATHLETE
NAME & LIKENESS LICENSING
LITIGATION
Case No. 09-cv-01967 CW (NC)
Related to
11-mc-80300 CW (NC)
12-mc-80020 CW (NC)
ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE
FROM THE NCAA AND THE BIG
TEN NETWORK
12
13
Re: Dkt. No. 484
14
15
16
17
Antitrust plaintiffs filed a motion to seal portions of documents produced and designated
18
as confidential by the NCAA and The Big Ten Network on July 17, 2012. Civil Local Rule 79-
19
5(d) requires the designating party to file within seven days of the sealing motion’s filing date a
`
20
declaration “establishing that the designated information is sealable, and must lodge and serve a
21
narrowly tailored proposed sealing order, or must withdraw the designation of confidentiality.”
22
Rule 79-5(d) further provides that “if the designating party does not file its responsive
23
declaration as required by this subsection, the document or proposed filing will be made part of
24
the public record.” More than seven days have passed since antitrust plaintiffs filed the sealing
25
motion, but neither the NCAA nor The Big Ten Network has filed a response in accordance
26
with Rule 79-5(d). Unless the NCAA or The Big Ten Network file such a response by July 30,
27
2012, the documents at issue will be made part of the public record.
28
//
Case No. 09-cv-01967 CW (NC)
ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
DATED: July 26, 2012
_____________________
Nathanael M. Cousins
United States Magistrate Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 09-cv-01967 CW (NC)
ORDER REQUESTING RESPONSE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?