Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc. et al
Filing
656
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken ADOPTING #641 INTENDED RULING,GRANTING #548 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, DENYING AS MOOT #595 MOTION TO STRIKE AMENDED DECLARATION, AND IMPOSING MONETARY SANCTIONS UPON ATTORNEY REGINALD TERRELL. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IN RE NCAA STUDENT-ATHLETE
NAME & LIKENESS LICENSING
LITIGATION
________________________________/
This document relates to:
FORMER PLAINTIFF ISHMAEL
THROWER
________________________________/
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
No. C 09-1967 CW
ORDER ADOPTING
INTENDED RULING
(Docket No. 641),
GRANTING MOTION
FOR SANCTIONS
(Docket No. 548),
DENYING AS MOOT
MOTION TO STRIKE
AMENDED
DECLARATION
(Docket No. 595),
AND IMPOSING
MONETARY SANCTIONS
UPON ATTORNEY
REGINALD TERRELL
13
On October 30, 2012, the Court issued a tentative ruling
14
indicating that it was inclined to grant Defendant Collegiate
15
Licensing Company (CLC)’s motion for monetary sanctions, impose
16
monetary sanctions on Reginald Terrell, attorney for former
17
Plaintiff Ishmael Thrower, and deny as moot CLC’s motion to strike
18
Terrell’s amended declaration.
19
At that time, the Court ordered CLC to file evidence of the
20
attorneys’ fees and costs that it incurred in connection with
21
filing the motion for sanctions and the August 21, 2012 discovery
22
letter brief, in preparing for and attending the August 29, 2012
23
hearing and in its repeated attempts to meet and confer with
24
Terrell regarding discovery from Thrower.
25
Terrell leave to file a response, by November 13, 2012, to CLC’s
26
evidence of its fees and costs.
27
include with this response a statement as to whether he requested
28
a hearing on the imposition of monetary sanctions.
The Court also granted
The Court directed Terrell to
The Court
1
warned Terrell that failure to file a response would result in the
2
Court’s adoption of the tentative decision as its final ruling,
3
and setting an amount of fees and costs to be paid.
4
On November 6, 2012, CLC filed evidence of the fees and costs
5
charged by its counsel, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP (KTS),
6
for the work identified in the Court’s order, as well as a
7
description of relevant qualifications and experience of each
8
individual at KTS who worked on these matters, a statement of
9
their customary hourly charges, and evidence of comparable
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
prevailing hourly rates in the local area.
Docket No. 647.
As of the date of this Order, Terrell has not filed a
12
response to CLC’s evidence of its fees and costs and has not
13
notified the Court that he requests a hearing on the imposition of
14
monetary sanctions.
15
order as its final ruling on CLC’s motions for sanctions and to
16
strike.
17
Court GRANTS CLC’s motion for monetary sanctions on Terrell but
18
declines to impose such sanctions upon Thrower (Docket No. 548),
19
and DENIES as moot CLC’s motion to strike Terrell’s amended
20
declaration (Docket No. 595).
21
Thus, the Court ADOPTS the October 30, 2012
For the reasons set forth in the tentative ruling, the
Based on the evidence submitted, and having received no
22
objection from Terrell, the Court finds that CLC reasonably
23
incurred $17,137.73 in attorneys’ fees and costs in connection
24
with filing the motion for sanctions and the August 21, 2012
25
discovery letter brief, in preparing for and attending the August
26
29, 2012 hearing and in its repeated attempts to meet and confer
27
with Terrell regarding discovery from Thrower, and that imposition
28
of sanctions in this amount is appropriate.
2
Accordingly, the
1
Court ORDERS that, within twenty-eight days of this Order, Terrell
2
pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $17,137.73 to CLC through
3
its counsel.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated: 11/19/2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?