Keller v. Electronic Arts Inc. et al

Filing 656

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken ADOPTING #641 INTENDED RULING,GRANTING #548 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, DENYING AS MOOT #595 MOTION TO STRIKE AMENDED DECLARATION, AND IMPOSING MONETARY SANCTIONS UPON ATTORNEY REGINALD TERRELL. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN RE NCAA STUDENT-ATHLETE NAME & LIKENESS LICENSING LITIGATION ________________________________/ This document relates to: FORMER PLAINTIFF ISHMAEL THROWER ________________________________/ United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 No. C 09-1967 CW ORDER ADOPTING INTENDED RULING (Docket No. 641), GRANTING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (Docket No. 548), DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO STRIKE AMENDED DECLARATION (Docket No. 595), AND IMPOSING MONETARY SANCTIONS UPON ATTORNEY REGINALD TERRELL 13 On October 30, 2012, the Court issued a tentative ruling 14 indicating that it was inclined to grant Defendant Collegiate 15 Licensing Company (CLC)’s motion for monetary sanctions, impose 16 monetary sanctions on Reginald Terrell, attorney for former 17 Plaintiff Ishmael Thrower, and deny as moot CLC’s motion to strike 18 Terrell’s amended declaration. 19 At that time, the Court ordered CLC to file evidence of the 20 attorneys’ fees and costs that it incurred in connection with 21 filing the motion for sanctions and the August 21, 2012 discovery 22 letter brief, in preparing for and attending the August 29, 2012 23 hearing and in its repeated attempts to meet and confer with 24 Terrell regarding discovery from Thrower. 25 Terrell leave to file a response, by November 13, 2012, to CLC’s 26 evidence of its fees and costs. 27 include with this response a statement as to whether he requested 28 a hearing on the imposition of monetary sanctions. The Court also granted The Court directed Terrell to The Court 1 warned Terrell that failure to file a response would result in the 2 Court’s adoption of the tentative decision as its final ruling, 3 and setting an amount of fees and costs to be paid. 4 On November 6, 2012, CLC filed evidence of the fees and costs 5 charged by its counsel, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP (KTS), 6 for the work identified in the Court’s order, as well as a 7 description of relevant qualifications and experience of each 8 individual at KTS who worked on these matters, a statement of 9 their customary hourly charges, and evidence of comparable United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 prevailing hourly rates in the local area. Docket No. 647. As of the date of this Order, Terrell has not filed a 12 response to CLC’s evidence of its fees and costs and has not 13 notified the Court that he requests a hearing on the imposition of 14 monetary sanctions. 15 order as its final ruling on CLC’s motions for sanctions and to 16 strike. 17 Court GRANTS CLC’s motion for monetary sanctions on Terrell but 18 declines to impose such sanctions upon Thrower (Docket No. 548), 19 and DENIES as moot CLC’s motion to strike Terrell’s amended 20 declaration (Docket No. 595). 21 Thus, the Court ADOPTS the October 30, 2012 For the reasons set forth in the tentative ruling, the Based on the evidence submitted, and having received no 22 objection from Terrell, the Court finds that CLC reasonably 23 incurred $17,137.73 in attorneys’ fees and costs in connection 24 with filing the motion for sanctions and the August 21, 2012 25 discovery letter brief, in preparing for and attending the August 26 29, 2012 hearing and in its repeated attempts to meet and confer 27 with Terrell regarding discovery from Thrower, and that imposition 28 of sanctions in this amount is appropriate. 2 Accordingly, the 1 Court ORDERS that, within twenty-eight days of this Order, Terrell 2 pay monetary sanctions in the amount of $17,137.73 to CLC through 3 its counsel. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: 11/19/2012 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?