Muniz v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Filing 307

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING 297 MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF SUPERSEDEAS BOND AND TO STAY ENFORCEMENT, PENDING APPEAL, OF AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND NON-STATUTORY COSTS TO PLAINTIFF KIM MUNIZ. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

KIM MUNIZ,

5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

No. C 09-1987 CW
Plaintiff,

v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a
corporation and DOE 1 through DOE
20, inclusive,
Defendant.
________________________________/

11

ORDER GRANTING
MOTION FOR
APPROVAL OF
SUPERSEDEAS BOND
AND TO STAY
ENFORCEMENT,
PENDING APPEAL, OF
AWARD OF
ATTORNEYS’ FEES
AND NON-STATUTORY
COSTS TO PLAINTIFF
KIM MUNIZ
(Docket No. 297)

12
13

On October 4, 2011, Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.

14

filed a Motion for Approval of Supersedeas Bond and to Stay

15

Enforcement, Pending Appeal, of Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Non-

16

Statutory Costs to Plaintiff Kim Muniz.

17

Court took the motion under submission on the papers.

18

18, 2011, Plaintiff Kim Muniz filed a Statement of Non-Opposition

19

to this motion.

20

On October 6, 2011, this
On October

The Court, having read and considered all of the papers

21

submitted on this motion and the entire record in this action,

22

hereby GRANTS Defendant’s motion and ORDERS as follows:

23

1.

That the supersedeas bond Defendant United Parcel

24

Service, Inc., posted on October 4, 2011, for $1,500,000, is

25

sufficient to cover the $697,971.80 judgment for attorneys’ fees

26

and non-statutory costs (plus any applicable interest) awarded to

27

Plaintiff Kim Muniz on August 23, 2011 (Docket No. 292) (the

28

“Attorneys’ Fees Award”).

1

2.

That, based on the Court’s approval of the

2

supersedeas bond, the Court stays the enforcement of the

3

Attorneys’ Fees Award pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

4

62(d).

5

3.

That the stay is effective as of this date and

6

shall remain in effect during the pendency of the appeal of the

7

Attorneys’ Fees Award (Ninth Circuit Docket No. 11-17282).

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

Dated: 11/2/2011

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2