Muniz v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Filing
315
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Responses due by 1/16/2014.Replies due by 1/30/2014. Replies due by 2/6/2014. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 12/31/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
KIM MUNIZ,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a
corporation and DOE 1 through DOE
20, inclusive,
14
15
No. C 09-1987 CW
Defendant.
________________________________/
16
17
Following a jury verdict in Plaintiff Kim Muniz’s favor,
18
Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. timely appealed the Court’s
19
order awarding Plaintiff $697,971.80 in attorneys’ fees under
20
California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act.1
21
2014, the Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and vacated in part the
22
fee award.
23
vacated the Court’s award of $55,286 in fees for work performed by
24
paralegal Susan Jaffe, holding that the award of the paralegal
25
fees was based upon impermissible hearsay.
Docket No. 313.
On December 5,
Specifically, the Ninth Circuit
26
27
28
1
Both parties filed appeals of other issues, which were
resolved by stipulation. See Docket Nos. 295, 300, 311.
1
The Ninth Circuit remanded the case to this Court
2
1) to reconsider an award of fees to Susan Jaffee for
paralegal work on behalf of Muniz and to determine, in
the first instance, whether any hearsay exception
applies to [Stephen] Jaffe’s declaration regarding fees
for paralegal work in this case and 2) to determine an
award to Muniz for reasonable attorney fees and costs
incurred in defending [the] appeal.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Docket No. 313 at 22-23.
Accordingly, the parties are directed to
submit briefs addressing any admissible evidence in the record to
support Ms. Jaffe’s fees and whether any hearsay exception applies
to Mr. Jaffe’s declaration regarding Ms. Jaffee’s fees.
In
addition, the parties’ briefs should address the reasonable amount
of fees to be awarded to Muniz incurred in defending the appeal.
Plaintiff shall file a brief, not to exceed fifteen pages, by
January 16, 2014.
Defendant shall file a responsive brief, also
not to exceed fifteen pages, by January 30, 2014.
file a reply brief by February 6, 2014.
Plaintiff may
The matter shall be taken
under submission and decided on the papers.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
Dated:
20
12/31/2013
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?