F. et al v. Blue Shield of California et al
Filing
82
ORDER re 81 Stipulation filed by Blue Shield of California. Signed by Judge Hamilton on 11/18/2010. (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2010)
<![CDATA[
F. et al v. Blue Shield of California et al
Doc. 82
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. BLUE SHIELD OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ Before the court is a stipulation and proposed order in which the parties agree that defendant may file an oversized reply brief of 25 pages ten pages more than is permitted by the local rules. Although the proposed order refers to "good cause appearing," the court can locate no good cause showing in the stipulation. Nor is good cause obvious in view of the fact that both the moving brief and the opposition brief are fewer than 25 pages long. The request is accordingly DENIED. DANIEL F., et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 09-2037 PJH ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 18, 2010 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
