Raytheon Applied Signal Technology, Inc. v. Emerging Markets Communications, Inc. et al

Filing 193

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting 191 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 191 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 178 MOTION for Protective Order and Proposed Order, 178 MOTI ON for Protective Order Applied Signal Technology, Inc. and Comtech EF Data Corp's Responses due by 11/18/2010. ViaSat, Inc. and Paradise Datacom, LLC's Replies due by 11/30/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu 11/12/10. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2010)

Applied Signal Technology, Inc. v. Emerging Markets Communications, Inc. et al

Doc. 193

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

RICK N. BRYSON (Pro hac vice) [e-mail] MICHELLE BREIT, Bar No. 133143 [e-mail] BRETT M. HAGER (Pro hac vice) [e-mail] BENJAMIN K. ERLICK (Pro hac vice) [e-mail] SANDERS & PARKS P.C. 3030 N. Third Street, Suite 1300 Phoenix, AZ 85012-3099 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone]

JAMES C. OTTESON, Bar No. 157781 [e-mail] AGILITY IP LAW 1900 University Circle, Suite 201 East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLIED SIGNAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND Third Party Defendant COMTECH EF DATA CORP.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION APPLIED SIGNAL TECHNOLOGY, INC. Plaintiff, vs. EMERGING MARKETS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., EMC SATCOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PARADISE DATACOM, LLC, and VIASAT, INC., Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD PARTY CLAIMS
1
STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO

Case No. 09-CV-02180-SBA

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINES TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO VIASAT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

CASE NO. 09-CV-02180-SBA

VIASAT'S AND PARADISE'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Plaintiff and counter-defendant, APPLIED SIGNAL TECHNOLOGY, INC ("AST"), third-party defendant and cross-claimant, COMTECH EF DATA CORP. ("Comtech"), defendant PARADISE DATACOM, LLC ("Paradise"), and defendant and counterclaimant VIASAT, INC. ("ViaSat") (collectively "the parties") hereby stipulate and move the Court for an order extending the date for AST and Comtech to file a response to ViaSat's and Paradise's Motion for Entry of Protective Order until November 18, 2010 and the date for Paradise and ViaSat to file a reply until November 30, 2010, as set forth in the Proposed Order filed concurrently herewith. The parties request this modified schedule to accommodate schedule conflicts experienced by counsel for AST and Comtech.

Date: November 10, 2010

SANDERS & PARKS P.C. /s/Michelle Breit _____ Michelle G. Breit Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLIED SIGNAL TECHNOLOGY And Third-Party Counterclaim Defendant COMTECH EF DATA, CORP.

Date: November 10, 2010

FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. /s/ Seth Sproul__ Seth M. Sproul Attorneys for Defendants PARADISE DATACOM, LLC and VIASAT, INC.

2
STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO

CASE NO. 09-CV-02180-SBA

VIASAT'S AND PARADISE'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Date: November 10, 2010

DECLARATION OF CONSENT Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Seth M. Sproul.

SANDERS & PARKS P.C. /s/ Michelle Breit________ Michelle G. Breit Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLIED SIGNAL TECHNOLOGY And Third-Party Counterclaim Defendant COMTECH EF DATA, CORP

3
STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO

CASE NO. 09-CV-02180-SBA

VIASAT'S AND PARADISE'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

ORDER The date for Applied Signal Technology, Inc. and Comtech EF Data Corp. to respond to ViaSat, Inc. and Paradise Datacom LLC's Motion for Entry of Protective Order is hereby extended to November 18, 2010 and the date for ViaSat, Inc. and Paradise Datacom, LLC to reply is hereby extended to November 30, 2010.
UNIT ED
S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

Dated: November 12, 2010

S

TED GRAN

___________________________________ ER DONNA M. RYUF C N D IS T IC T O R MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
A

4
STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO

LI

onn Judge D

FO

u a M. Ry

R NIA
CASE NO. 09-CV-02180-SBA

NO
VIASAT'S AND PARADISE'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

RT

H