Martinez et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 406

ORDER re 405 Granting Stipulation Continuing Deadlines. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/5/2010. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2010)

Download PDF
Dominguez et al v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 406 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STEPHEN P. BERZON (SBN 46540) SCOTT A. KRONLAND (SBN 171693) STACEY M. LEYTON (SBN 203827) PEDER J. THOREEN (SBN 217081) ANNE N. ARKUSH (SBN 254985) Altshuler Berzon LLP 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, California 94108 Telephone: (415) 421-7151 Facsimile: (415) 362-8064 sberzon@altshulerberzon.com skronland@altshulerberzon.com sleyton@altshulerberzon.com pthoreen@altshulerberzon.com aarkush@altshulerberzon.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION LYDIA DOMINGUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 09-02306 CW CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES Stipulation and Order Continuing Deadlines Case No. C09-02306 CW Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, discovery in this case has been on-going; WHEREAS, the present non-expert discovery cut-off is September 30, 2010, and expert disclosures are due on September 30, 2010; WHEREAS, the Parties believe that the current discovery deadlines have become unworkable for a variety of reasons, including the unavailability of key witnesses of Defendants during the months of May and June due to pressing budget-related activities; the fact that State Defendants' production of voluminous electronic data regarding In-Home Supportive Services consumers and providers was delayed by months for technical reasons and there is a need for additional time for expert analysis of this data; the difficulty of scheduling Defendants' depositions of the individual and union Plaintiffs prior to the discovery deadline after Magistrate Judge Larson resolved the parties' dispute regarding the number of depositions Defendants could take; and the fact that, while discovery has been on-going, Plaintiffs and Defendants have had to devote considerable time and resources to ongoing proceedings in this case including the litigation of the temporary restraining order that was entered on June 29, 2010; WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed upon a modest extension of the discovery and related deadlines that they believe will allow for the completion of discovery while minimizing delay of trial; WHEREAS, the Court has previously adjusted deadlines in this case six times (Dkt. #59, 62, 158, 179, 192, 281; see also Dkt. #94); however, only the most recent modification affected the initial deadlines set by the Court for discovery, case-dispositive motions, or trial; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties through their respective counsel that, subject to Court approval, the following schedule should replace that set by the Court in its Order Adopting Stipulation Continuing Deadlines filed May 7, 2010 (Dkt. #281): Completion of Fact Discovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10/29/10 Disclosure of identities and reports of expert witnesses Initial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11/19/10 Rebuttal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/17/10 Completion of Expert Discovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 01/21/11 Plaintiffs' Opening Brief re Dispositive Motions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 02/17/11 Defendants' Opposition and Cross-Motion re Dispositive Motions . . . . . . 03/10/11 Stipulation and Order Continuing Deadlines Case No. C09-02306 CW 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs' Reply and Opposition re Dispositive Motions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03/24/11 Defendants' Surreply re Dispositive Motions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 03/31/11 Case Management Conference Statement due . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 04/07/11 Hearing on Dispositive Motions and Case Management Conference . . . . . 04/14/11 @ 2:00 p.m. Pretrial Conference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 06/21/11 @ 2:00 p.m. Trial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 07/05/11 @ 8:30 a.m. Dated: September 30, 2010 Respectfully submitted, STEPHEN P. BERZON SCOTT A. KRONLAND STACEY M. LEYTON PEDER J. THOREEN ANNE N. ARKUSH Altshuler Berzon LLP By: /s/ Stacey M. Leyton Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: September 30, 2010 Respectfully submitted, EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of California SUSAN M. CARSON Supervising Deputy Attorney General JENNIFER A. BUNSHOFT Deputy Attorney General By: /s/ Susan M. Carson Attorneys for State Defendants Dated: September 30, 2010 Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL G. WOODS TIMOTHY J. BUCHANAN MANDY L. JEFFCOACH McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP By: /s/ Timothy J. Buchanan Attorneys for Fresno Defendants Stipulation and Order Continuing Deadlines Case No. C09-02306 CW 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 5, 2010 Dated: September 30, 2010 GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION I, Stacey M. Leyton, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this stipulation and proposed order. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Defendants' counsel have concurred in the filing of this document with their electronic signatures. By: /s/ Stacey M. Leyton Attorneys for Plaintiffs PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, except that the stipulation is declined regarding the dispositive motion schedule and pretrial and trial dates. July 5 is not an available trial date, and in any event would be too close to the motion hearing date. Counsel may consult with the Courtroom Deputy regarding available trial dates and submit another stipulation. The dispositive motion hearing date must be at least 90 days before the trial date. _____________________________ Honorable Claudia A. Wilken United States District Court Judge Stipulation and Order Continuing Deadlines Case No. C09-02306 CW 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?