Bolden v. Ayers
Filing
19
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 9/14/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12
Clifford Stanley BOLDEN,
Petitioner,
13
15
DEATH-PENALTY CASE
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
v.
14
Case No. C 9-2365 PJH
Michael MARTEL,
Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison,1
16
Respondent.
17
18
On August 1, 2011, the Court appointed counsel for Petitioner in this capital habeas
19
action. (Doc. No. 15.) Counsel for Respondent subsequently entered their appearances. (Docs.
20
Nos. 16–18.). Good cause appearing therefor, the Court enters this Initial Scheduling Order.
21
Within forty-five days from the date of this Order, the parties shall meet and confer to
22
prepare, and shall file, a joint case-management statement and proposed order. In the statement,
23
the parties shall discuss their preliminary views of anticipated proceedings in the present action.
24
The statement shall include a proposed schedule for briefing any renewed motion for equitable
25
tolling of the statute of limitations, and proposed schedules for briefing any other motions that
26
27
28
1
Michael Martel is automatically substituted for his predecessor as the named
Respondent. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).
Case No. 4-9-cv-2365-PJH
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
(DPSAGOK)
1
must be addressed prior to the filing of a finalized petition2 in the event that equitable tolling is
2
granted; unless otherwise ordered, such motions will be decided on the papers.
3
Within forty-five days from the date of this Order, Respondent shall lodge with the Court
4
two electronic copies (compact discs) of the material enumerated in Habeas Local Rule 2254-
5
27(a). One copy shall be sent to chambers in Oakland; the other copy shall be sent to the Court’s
6
Death Penalty Staff Attorney assigned to this action, George O. Kolombatovich, in San
7
Francisco. Respondent shall not lodge any paper copies.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 14, 2011
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
27
28
In capital habeas actions, “[t]he term ‘finalized petition’ shall refer to the petition filed
by retained or appointed counsel. . . .” Habeas L.R. 2254-28(a). Petitioner already has filed a
Pro Se Protective Petition. (Doc. No. 8.)
2
Case No. 4-9-cv-2365-PJH
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
(DPSAGOK)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?