O'Hines v. Florence, Arizona SSU Squad

Filing 4

ORDER OF DISMISSAL, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 7/31/09. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 vs. JEFF FREELAND, Warden, Defendant. JAMES LYNN O'HINES, Plaintiff, vs. FLORENCE, ARIZONA, SSU SQUAD, Defendant. JAMES LYNN O'HINES, Plaintiff, vs. JEFF FREELAND, Warden, Defendant. / / No. C 09-2628 PJH (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL No. C 09-2475 PJH (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL / JAMES LYNN O'HINES, Plaintiff, No. C 09-2474 PJH (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 These are civil rights cases filed pro se by a prisoner incarcerated in Florence, Arizona. In cases C 09-2474 PJH (PR) and C 09-2628 PJH (PR), on the day the complaints were filed the clerk notified plaintiff that he had not paid the filing fees or applied for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 On the day the complaint in C 09-2475 PJH (PR) was filed, the clerk notified plaintiff that his application to proceed IFP was deficient in that he had failed to use the correct form, had not provided a certificate of funds in inmate account as required by this court, and had not attached a printout of transactions in his inmate account as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). In all three cases plaintiff has filed an application to proceed IFP, but all three applications omit the printout of transactions in plaintiff's inmate account required by statute. These cases therefore are DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk shall close these files. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 31, 2009. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\PRO-SE\PJH\CR.09\O'HINES2474.DSM.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?