Herson et al v. City of Richmond

Filing 127

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 123 Stipulation filed by City of Richmond. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/23/11. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2011)

Download PDF
Herson et al v. City of Richmond Doc. 127 1 RANDY RIDDLE (CA State Bar No. 121788) CITY ATTORNEY 2 KEVIN SCOTT DICKEY (CA State Bar No. 184251) CHIEF DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY 3 CITY OF RICHMOND 450 Civic Center Plaza 4 Richmond, CA 94804-1630 Telephone: (510) 620-6509 5 Facsimile: (510) 620-6518 randy riddle@ci.richmond.ca.us 6 MATTHEW D. ZINN (CA State Bar No. 214587) 7 WINTER KING (CA State Bar No. 237958) JACLYN H. PRANGE (CA State Bar No. 270929) 8 SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP 396 Hayes Street 9 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (415) 552-7272 10 Facsimile: (415) 552-5816 Zinn@smwlaw.com 11 King@smwlaw.com Prange@smwlaw.com 12 Attorneys for Defendant 13 CITY OF RICHMOND 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 OAKLAND DIVISION 17 18 JEFFREY HERSON, an individual; EAST 19 BAY OUTDOOR, INC., a California corporation, 20 Plaintiffs, 21 v. 22 CITY OF RICHMOND, a charter city, 23 Defendant. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING HEARING DATE AND DEADLINE FOR REPLY CASE NO. 9-cv-02516-PJH Dockets.Justia.com Case No. 4:09-cv-02516-PJH ORDER DENYING STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING HEARING DATE ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT'S REPLY Judge: Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton Dept.: Courtroom 3 Trial Date: July 25, 2011 1 WHEREAS, the parties are entering reciprocal stipulations to continue the hearing on 2 Defendant's motion for summary judgment by one week to April 13, 2011 and continue the 3 briefing and hearing schedule on Defendant's motion for sanctions, to accommodate conflicts in 4 the schedules of both parties. 5 WHEREAS, the parties seek herein an order of the Court extending the hearing date on 6 the motion for summary judgment and will separately submit a stipulation to the assigned 7 magistrate judge to modify the briefing schedule on the motion for sanctions. 8 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto 9 as follows: 10 The parties respectfully request that the hearing date on Defendant's Motion for 11 Summary Judgment be moved from April 6, 2011 to April 13, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. Reply papers 12 shall be filed by March 30, 2011. 13 DATED: March 17, 2011 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING HEARING DATE CASE NO. 9-cv-02516-PJH RAM & OLSON LLP By: /s/ Karl Olson KARL OLSON Attorneys for Plaintiffs JEFFREY HERSON and EAST BAY OUTDOOR, INC. DATED: March 17, 2011 SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER LLP By: /s/ Winter King WINTER KING Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF RICHMOND 1 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the hearing on Defendant's 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: March ___, 2011 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 23 UNIT ED S 3 Motion for Summary Judgment is continued from April 6, 2011TRApril 13, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. S DIS to ICT TE C TA 4 Reply papers shall be filed by March 30, 2011. RT U O DENIE D Ju PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge C ER N F D IS T IC T O R STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING HEARING DATE CASE NO. 9-cv-02516-PJH 2 A LI FO llis J. H dge Phy amilton R NIA NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?