Herson et al v. City of Richmond

Filing 84

ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS re 82 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Jeffrey Herson. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 12/28/10. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2010)

Download PDF
Herson et al v. City of Richmond Doc. 84 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVID J. BEAUVAIS (CA Bar # 84275) 409 13th Street, 20th Floor Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 832-3605 Facsimile: 9510) 832-3610 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) No. C 09-2516 PJH ) ) ) ) SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS Plaintiffs, ) AND ORDER ) vs. ) ) ) CITY OF RICHMOND, ) ) ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________) TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that plaintiff, JEFFREY HERSON, hereby substitutes DAVID J. BEAUVAIS, as his attorney of record in place and in stead of BOSTWICK & JASSY, LLP. The address of plaintiff's new counsel is 409 13th Street, 20th Floor, Oakland, California 94612. Telephone: (510) 832-3605. Facsimile: (510) 832-3610. DATED: December 20, 2010. /s/ Jeffrey Herson JEFFREY HERSON JEFFREY HERSON and EAST BAY OUTDOOR, Inc., SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS AND ORDER 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I consent to said substitution. DATED: December 20, 2010 /s/ Gary L. Bostwick On behalf of BOSTWICK & JASSY, LLP. I accept said substitution. DATED: December 20, 2010 /s/ David J. Beauvais DAVID J. BEAUVAIS Attorney for Plaintiff IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 12/28/10 UNIT ED ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO hyllis Judge P J. Hami lton R NIA ERED O ORD IT IS S _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS AND ORDER NO RT H 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS AND ORDER 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?