Ko v. Natura Pet Products, Inc. et al

Filing 94

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 88 MOTION for Settlement . Motion Hearing set for 3/6/2012 01:00 PM before Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 2/13/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ALLEN RUBY, ESQ. SB# 47109 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 1100 Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: (650) 470-4500 Facsimile: (650) 470-4570 allen.ruby@skadden.com JAMES J. FROST (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) PATRICK E. BROOKHOUSER, JR. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) McGrath, North, Mullin & Kratz, PC LLO 3700 First National Tower 1601 Dodge Street Omaha, NE 68102 Telephone: (402) 341-3070 Facsimile: (402) 341-0216 jfrost@mcgrathnorth.com pbrookhouser@mcgrathnorth.com 10 11 Attorney for Defendants NATURA PET PRODUCTS, INC.; and PETER ATKINS 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 OAKLAND DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 JUDY KO, individually and on behalf of all other Case No. CV-09-02619 SAB persons similarly situated and on behalf of the general public, STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING FAIRNESS Plaintiffs, HEARING v. NATURA PET PRODUCTS, INC., et al Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING FAIRNESS HEARING CASE NO. CV-09-02619 SAB 1 WHEREAS, the Court preliminarily approved the proposed class action settlement 2 between Defendants Natura Pet Products, Inc. and Peter Atkins (hereinafter referred to as 3 “Defendants”), and the class defined as “all persons residing in the United States who purchased 4 any Natura Product for personal, family, or household purposes (the “Class”) during the time 5 period from March 20, 2005 to July 8, 2011 (the “Class Period”)” on July 19, 2011; 6 WHEREAS, by its Order of July 19, 2011 and Civil Minutes July 8, 2011, Plaintiff Judy 7 Ko’s (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) motion for final approval of the proposed settlement 8 and her separate motion for approval of the award of attorneys’ fees and costs to Class Counsel, 9 and an incentive award to the Plaintiff was originally scheduled for February 17, 2012; 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 WHEREAS, by the Clerk’s Notice of September 29, 2011, the Court rescheduled Plaintiff’s motions for February 14, 2012; WHEREAS, by its Order of February 8, 2012, the Court continued the hearing to February 21, 2012 at 1:00 p.m.; WHEREAS, counsel for the Defendants are unavailable to attend a hearing on February 21, 2012; and WHEREAS, the parties respectfully request and submit that it is therefore in the interest 17 of judicial economy and efficiency for the Court to reschedule the February 21, 2012 Fairness 18 Hearing to March 6, 2012 at 1:00 p.m., a date and time convenient on the Court’s calendar. 19 20 21 22 IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, by and between the undersigned counsel for the Parties that: The Fairness Hearing scheduled for February 21, 2012 be vacated and rescheduled to March 6, 2012 at 1:00 p.m. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 10, 2012 KEEGAN & BAKER, LLP By: /s /Patrick N. Keegan_________________ Patrick N. Keegan Attorneys for Representative Plaintiffs JUDY KO and the Class 1 2 3 Dated: February 10, 2012 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP MC GRATH, NORTH, MULLIN & KRATZ, PC LLO 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ Allen Ruby______________________ Allen Ruby Attorney for Defendants NATURA PET PRODUCTS, INC.; and PETER ATKINS ORDER 1 2 3 4 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Fairness Hearing scheduled for February 21, 2012 be vacated and rescheduled to March 6, 2012 at 1:00 p.m. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 2/13/12 ________ Hon. Sandra Brown Armstrong United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?