Fobbs v. New Haven Unified School District et al

Filing 40

ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 25 Motion to Consolidate Cases (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California ALVETT FOBBS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NEW HAVEN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ Plaintiffs Alvett Fobbs, as guardian ad litem for Sterling S., a minor, and Teola Coleman, as guardian ad litem for Jalen L., a minor, seek an order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a) consolidating the above-entitled action for all purposes with Paige v. New Haven Unified School Dist., C-09-0687 PJH. The court related these two actions pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12 on July 28, 2009. Defendants New Haven Unified School District and the City of Union City, also defendants in the Paige case, oppose consolidation. Angelique Paige, plaintiff in the Paige case, does not oppose consolidation. Having read the parties' papers and carefully considered their arguments, and good cause appearing, the court hereby DENIES the motion. Although there may be, as plaintiffs assert, some common questions of law and fact in the two cases, there also appear to be numerous legal and factual issues that are unrelated. No. C 09-2723 PJH ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 The court finds, on balance, that court efficiency would not be enhanced by consolidation, and that the maintenance of separate actions will not lead to a substantial risk of inconsistent adjudications, as the cases remain related on the court's docket. The parties are also free to stipulate to coordinated discovery events, should they find that advantageous. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 18, 2009 ______________________________ PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?