Boulware v. Dunstan
Filing
29
ORDER Granting 28 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/14/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2011)
1
2
3
4
J. RANDALL ANDRADA (SBN 70000)
NICOLE ROMAN (SBN 267730)
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 225
Oakland, California 94612
Tel.: (510) 287-4160
Fax: (510) 287-4161
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant
D.M. DUNSTAN
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
12
13
14
Case No.: 4:09-cv-02792-CW
RUBEN ODELL BOULWARE,
11
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT WITH PREJUDICE
v.
D.M. DUNSTAN,
Action Filed: June 24, 2009
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Defendant D.M. DUNSTAN, by and through his counsel, NICOLE ROMAN of Andrada &
Associates, and Plaintiff, RUBEN ODELL BOULWARE, in pro se, submit the following Stipulation
of Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with
prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that each party shall bear its own costs.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
{00076671.DOC/}DOC 0861
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Boulware v D. M. Dunstan
4:09-cv-02792-CW
1
RUBEN ODELL BOULWARE
Date: December 9, 2011
2
3
By
/s/ Ruben Odell Boulware
RUBEN ODELL BOULWARE
4
5
6
Dated:
December 12, 2011
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
7
/s/ Nicole Roman
By
8
NICOLE ROMAN
Attorneys for Defendant
D.M. DUNSTAN
9
10
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
11
12
Plaintiff RUBEN ODELL BOULWARE’s claims against Defendant D.M. DUNSTAN are
HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to the stipulation between the parties.
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12/14/2011
DATED: _______________
17
HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
{00076671.DOC/}DOC 0861
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Boulware v D. M. Dunstan
4:09-cv-02792-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?