Boulware v. Dunstan

Filing 29

ORDER Granting 28 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/14/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 J. RANDALL ANDRADA (SBN 70000) NICOLE ROMAN (SBN 267730) ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 225 Oakland, California 94612 Tel.: (510) 287-4160 Fax: (510) 287-4161 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant D.M. DUNSTAN 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 OAKLAND DIVISION PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES 12 13 14 Case No.: 4:09-cv-02792-CW RUBEN ODELL BOULWARE, 11 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT WITH PREJUDICE v. D.M. DUNSTAN, Action Filed: June 24, 2009 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Defendant D.M. DUNSTAN, by and through his counsel, NICOLE ROMAN of Andrada & Associates, and Plaintiff, RUBEN ODELL BOULWARE, in pro se, submit the following Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that each party shall bear its own costs. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 {00076671.DOC/}DOC 0861 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Boulware v D. M. Dunstan 4:09-cv-02792-CW 1 RUBEN ODELL BOULWARE Date: December 9, 2011 2 3 By /s/ Ruben Odell Boulware RUBEN ODELL BOULWARE 4 5 6 Dated: December 12, 2011 ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES 7 /s/ Nicole Roman By 8 NICOLE ROMAN Attorneys for Defendant D.M. DUNSTAN 9 10 PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES 11 12 Plaintiff RUBEN ODELL BOULWARE’s claims against Defendant D.M. DUNSTAN are HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to the stipulation between the parties. 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12/14/2011 DATED: _______________ 17 HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 {00076671.DOC/}DOC 0861 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Boulware v D. M. Dunstan 4:09-cv-02792-CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?