Ashker v. Cate et al

Filing 32

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting PLAINTIFFS UNOPPOSED 29 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 TODD ASHKER, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 No. 09-02948 CW Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION v. MATHEW CATE, et al., 12 Defendants. / 13 14 15 Plaintiff Todd Ashker requests an additional forty-five days 16 to file an opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss and for 17 summary judgment. 18 opposition. 19 motion for an extension of time. 20 or before June 27, 2011. Defendants have filed a notice of non- For good cause appearing, the Court grants Plaintiff’s Plaintiff’s opposition is due on 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 5/24/2011 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 TODD ASHKER, Case Number: CV09-02948 CW 4 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 5 v. 6 MATHEW CATE et al, 7 Defendant. 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on May 24, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 13 14 17 Todd Ashker C58191 D1-119 Pelican Bay State Prison P.O. Box 7500 Crescent City, CA 95532 18 Dated: May 24, 2011 15 16 19 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?