Ashker v. Cate et al
Filing
32
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting PLAINTIFFS UNOPPOSED 29 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
TODD ASHKER,
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
No. 09-02948 CW
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S
UNOPPOSED MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE
OPPOSITION
v.
MATHEW CATE, et al.,
12
Defendants.
/
13
14
15
Plaintiff Todd Ashker requests an additional forty-five days
16
to file an opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss and for
17
summary judgment.
18
opposition.
19
motion for an extension of time.
20
or before June 27, 2011.
Defendants have filed a notice of non-
For good cause appearing, the Court grants Plaintiff’s
Plaintiff’s opposition is due on
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
5/24/2011
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
TODD ASHKER,
Case Number: CV09-02948 CW
4
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
5
v.
6
MATHEW CATE et al,
7
Defendant.
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court,
Northern District of California.
That on May 24, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies)
in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in
the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's
office.
13
14
17
Todd Ashker C58191
D1-119
Pelican Bay State Prison
P.O. Box 7500
Crescent City, CA 95532
18
Dated: May 24, 2011
15
16
19
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?