United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review v. Nguyen

Filing 10

ORDER VACATING HEARING AND DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re 9 Order to Show Cause, Motions terminated. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 10/1/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2009) Modified on 10/5/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR 7 IMMIGRATION REVIEW, 8 9 Petitioner, v. Case No: C 09-2981 SBA ORDER VACATING HEARING AND DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE [Docket 9] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 10 NI CHI NGUYEN, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 1, 2009 ______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Court Petitioner previously requested an order to show cause (OSC) why a subpoena should not be issued to compel Respondent Ni Chi Nguyen to appear in immigration court for a removal hearing to be held on August 12, 2009. (Docket 7, 9.) However, since that hearing date has passed and given that the Court has not been advised that a new, future date has in fact been set by the immigration court, the OSC is now moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the OSC for the issuance of a subpoena requiring Respondent's appearance in immigration court on August 12, 2009 is DISCHARGED AS MOOT. This Order is made without prejudice to the submission of an amended request for an OSC in the event a new date before the immigration court is set at which Respondent's appearance is required. The October 6, 2009 hearing date in this Court is VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Respondent.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?