United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review v. Nguyen

Filing 9

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 10/6/2009 01:00 PM. Show Cause Response due by 9/25/2009. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 8/5/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2009) Modified on 8/6/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 JOSEPH P. RUSSONEILLO, CSBN 44332 United States Attorney 2 JOANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143 Chief, Civil Division 3 EDWARD A. OLSEN, CSBN 214150 Assistant United States Attorney 4 1301 Clay Street, Suite 340S 5 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 637-3697 6 FAX: (510) 637-3724 7 Attorneys for Petitioner 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) No. 09-2981-SBA ) ) [PROPOSED] REVISED ORDER TO ) SHOW CAUSE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 12 JUSTICE, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, 13 Petitioner, 14 v. 15 NI CHI NGUYEN, 16 Respondent. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) Good cause having been shown by the petitioner upon its petition filed in the above-entitled matter, it is hereby: ORDERED that respondent, Ni Chi Nguyen, is ordered to appear before this Court on Tuesday, October 6, 2009, at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom No.3, Third Floor, United States District Court, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, California, 94612, and then and there, show cause, if any, why he should not be compelled to appear at the removal hearing of Luu Thi Pham (A57-960-802) in Immigration Court. ORDERED that on or before September 25, 2009, the respondent may file and serve a written response to the Petition to Enforce A Subpoena Issued By A United States Immigration Judge, supported by appropriate affidavit(s) or declaration(s) in conformance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746. 1 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated:8/5/09 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?