Trahan v. U.S. Bank National Association

Filing 201

ORDER GRANTING 198 Voluntary Dismissal. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 7/1/15. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2015)

Download PDF
Case4:09-cv-03111-JSW Document198-1 Filed06/29/15 Page1 of 2 1 5 Edward J. Wynne (SBN 165819) ewynne@wynnelawfirm.com J.E.B. Pickett (SBN 154294) jebpickett@wynnelawfirm.com WYNNE LAW FIRM 100 Drakes Landing Road, Suite 275 Greenbrae, CA 94904 Telephone (415) 461-6400 Facsimile (415) 461-3900 6 Plaintiff’s Counsel 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 12 13 JERRY TRAHAN, individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated, 14 15 16 Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 09-cv-03111-JSW (DMR) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1) U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 17 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WYNNE LAW FIRM 100 DRAKES LANDING ROAD SUITE 275 GREENBRAE, CA 94904 (415) 461-6400 WWW.WYNNELAWFIRM.COM [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 09-cv-03111-JSW Case4:09-cv-03111-JSW Document198-1 Filed06/29/15 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 Having considered Defendant's lack of ORDER opposition, and Having considered Plaintiff Jerry Trahan’s (“Plaintiff”) Notice of Dismissal of Class Allegations With Prejudice, the Court HEREBY ORDERS THE FOLLOWING: Plaintiff’s Request for Dismissal With Prejudice is GRANTED. 5 6 7 8 9 Dated:________________________ July 1, 2015 ____________________________ Hon. Donna M. Ryu United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WYNNE LAW FIRM 100 DRAKES LANDING ROAD SUITE 275 GREENBRAE, CA 94904 (415) 461-6400 WWW.WYNNELAWFIRM.COM 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 09-cv-03111-JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?