Morgenstein v. AT&T Mobility, LLC

Filing 38

STIPULATION AND ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/3/09. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2009)

Download PDF
Case4:09-cv-03173-SBA Document36 Filed10/30/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MAYER BROWN LLP DONALD M. FALK (SBN 150256) dfalk@mayerbrown.com RENA CHNG (SBN 209665) rchng@mayerbrown.com J. JOANN LIAO (SBN 227329) jliao@mayerbrown.com Two Palo Alto Square, Suite 300 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 Telephone: (650) 331-2000 Facsimile: (650) 331-2060 JOHN NADOLENCO (SBN 181128) jnado lenco@mayerbrown.co m 350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503 Telephone: (213) 229-9500 Facsimile: (213) 625-0248 Attorneys for Defendant AT&T MOBILITY LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION DAVID MORGENSTEIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. Plaint iff, v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 50, inclusive. Defendant. Case No. CV 09-3173 SBA STIPULATION AND XXXXXXXXXX [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. CV 09-3173 SBA Case4:09-cv-03173-SBA Document36 Filed10/30/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Mediation The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) Dated: October 30, 2009 Nassiri & Jung LLP, By: _/s/ Kassra P. Nassiri Kassra P. Nassiri Attorneys for Plaintiff David Morgenstein Dated: October 30, 2009 Mayer Brown LLP, By: _/s/ John Nadolenco John Nadolenco Attorneys for Defendant AT&T Mobility LLC Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B), I hereby attest that Kassra P. Nassiri and John Nadolenco concur in the filing of this document. ___/s/ J. Joann Liao _______ J. Joann Liao 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. CV 09-3173 SBA Case4:09-cv-03173-SBA Document36 Filed10/30/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11/ _ 09 Dated:____3/___________ IT IS SO ORDERED. XXXXXXXXXORDER [PROPOSED] Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Mediation Deadline for ADR session: 90 days from the date of this order. ___________________________________ The Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong United States District Judge 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. CV 09-3173 SBA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?