O'Bannon, Jr. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
Filing
198
ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken Granting #196 Stipulation Concerning Dismissal of Claims (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2014)
MICHAEL D. HAUSFELD (pro hac vice)
1 mhausfeld@hausfeldllp.com
HILARY K. SCHERRER (SBN 209451)
2 hscherrer@hausfeldllp.com
SATHYA S. GOSSELIN (SBN 269171)
3 sgosselin@hausfeldllp.com
SWATHI BOJEDLA
4 sbojedla@hausfeldllp.com (pro hac vice)
HAUSFELD LLP
5 1700 K Street, NW, Suite 650
Washington, D.C. 20006
6 Telephone:
(202) 540-7200
Facsimile:
(202) 540-7201
7
MICHAEL P. LEHMANN (SBN 77152)
8 mlehmann@hausfeldllp.com
BRUCE J. WECKER (SBN 78530)
9 bwecker@hausfeldllp.com
HAUSFELD LLP
10 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3400
San Francisco, California 94104
11 Telephone:
(415) 633-1908
Facsimile:
(415) 358-4980
12
Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel
13
GLENN D. POMERANTZ (SBN 112503)
glenn.pomerantz@mto.com
KELLY M. KLAUS (SBN 161091)
kelly.klaus@mto.com
ROHIT K. SINGLA (SBN 213057)
rohit.singla@mto.com
CAROLYN HOECKER LUEDTKE (SBN 207976)
carolyn.luedtke@mto.com
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-2907
Telephone:
(415) 512-4000
Facsimile:
(415) 512-4077
GREGORY L. CURTNER (Pro Hac Vice)
gcurtner@schiffhardin.com
ROBERT J. WIERENGA (SBN 183687)
rwierenga@schiffhardin.com
SCHIFF HARDIN LLP
350 Main St., Suite 210
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Telephone:
(734) 222-1500
Facsimile:
(734) 222-1501
Attorneys for Defendant
National Collegiate Athletic Association
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
Case No. 09-cv-3329-CW
EDWARD C. O’BANNON, JR. on behalf of
18 himself and all others similarly situated,
19
20
Plaintiffs,
v.
21 NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC
ASSOCIATION (NCAA); ELECTRONIC
22 ARTS, INC.; and COLLEGIATE
LICENSING COMPANY,
23
Defendants.
24
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONCERNING DISMISSAL OF
CLAIMS
Judge:
Crtrm:
Hon. Claudia Wilken
2, 4th Floor
25
26
27
28
23530916.2
Case No. 09-cv-3329-CW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS
1
WHEREAS, the individual named Antitrust Plaintiffs are defined as Ed O’Bannon, Oscar
2 Robertson, William Russell, Harry Flournoy, Alex Gilbert, Sam Jacobson, Thad Jaracz, David
3 Lattin, Patrick Maynor, Tyrone Prothro, Damien Rhodes, Eric Riley, Bob Tallent, Danny
4 Wimprine, Ray Ellis, Jake Fischer, Jake Smith, Darius Robinson, Chase Garnham, and Moses
5 Alipate (“Antitrust Plaintiffs”);
6
WHEREAS, on May 14, 2014, Antitrust Plaintiffs informed the National Collegiate
7 Athletic Association (NCAA) and the Court that the Antitrust Plaintiffs do not seek a jury trial on
8 their claims but rather intend to try their claims exclusively to the Court;
9
WHEREAS, on May 19, 2014, Antitrust Plaintiffs filed a statement informing the Court
10 that they are dismissing with prejudice all claims against the NCAA for individual damages,
11 disgorgement of profits, and an accounting, while preserving their claims for injunctive and
12 declaratory relief;
13
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT:
14
1.
Each individual named Antitrust Plaintiff dismisses with prejudice all of their
15 claims against the NCAA for individual damages (a) asserted in the Third Consolidated Amended
16 Complaint (“TCAC”) or (b) arising from the Antitrust Plaintiffs’ allegations in the TCAC.
17
2.
Each individual named Antitrust Plaintiff dismisses with prejudice all of their
18 claims against the NCAA for any disgorgement of profits or unjust enrichment (a) asserted in the
19 TCAC or (b) arising from the Antitrust Plaintiffs’ allegations in the TCAC.
20
3.
Each individual named Antitrust Plaintiff dismisses with prejudice all of their
21 claims against the NCAA for any type of accounting.
22
4.
The individual named Antitrust Plaintiffs confirm that it is their intention to dismiss
23 — and they do hereby dismiss — with prejudice any and all of their claims or requests for relief
24 (a) asserted in the TCAC or (b) arising from the Antitrust Plaintiffs’ allegations in the TCAC
25 against the NCAA or its member institutions that seek a monetary remedy, regardless whether
26 such remedy or relief might be styled as “equitable” in some circumstances. This stipulation bars
27 the individual named Antitrust Plaintiffs from replicating in a new action against the NCAA or its
28
1175437.1
-1Case No. 09-cv-3329-CW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS
1 member institutions the Antitrust Plaintiffs’ claims or requests for relief (a) asserted in the TCAC
2 or (b) arising from the Antitrust Plaintiffs’ allegations in the TCAC that seek a monetary remedy,
3 regardless whether such remedy or relief might be styled as “equitable” in some circumstances.
4
5.
Consistent with previous submissions to the Court and the NCAA, the Antitrust
5 Plaintiffs will not pursue monetary remedies, however styled, or an accounting at the upcoming
6 June 9, 2014 bench trial.
7
6.
Nothing in this stipulation is intended to, or does, waive the NCAA’s objections to
8 proceeding with a trial of any of the claims of the Antitrust Plaintiffs, including for injunctive and
9 declaratory relief, as a bench trial, rather than as a trial before a jury, or as a bench trial before a
10 jury trial in any related matters.
11
7.
Nothing in this stipulation is intended to, or does, waive the Antitrust Plaintiffs’
12 claims against the NCAA and its member institutions for injunctive and declaratory relief.
13
8.
Nothing in this stipulation is intended to, or does, waive the Antitrust Plaintiffs’
14 claims against Electronic Arts, Inc. and Collegiate Licensing Company, as asserted in the TCAC.
15
16
Respectfully submitted,
17
HAUSFELD LLP
18
19
By: /s/ Michael Hausfeld
Michael D. Hausfeld
Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel
1700 K St. NW, Suite 650
Washington, DC 20006
20
21
22
23
Dated: June 8, 2014
24
25
26
27
28
1175437.1
-2Case No. 09-cv-3329-CW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS
1
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
2
3
By: /s/ Rohit Singla 1
Rohit K. Singla
Attorneys for Defendant NCAA
560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-2907
4
5
6
Dated: June 8, 2014
7
8
9
[PROPOSED] ORDER
10
Pursuant to the stipulation of counsel, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated:____________
6/9/2014
13
_______________________________________
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
Chief United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
I, Sathya S. Gosselin, attest that I have obtained concurrence from Rohit K. Singla in the filing of
27 this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Concerning Dismissal of Claims. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 51(i)(3).
28
1175437.1
-3Case No. 09-cv-3329-CW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
I hereby certify that on June 8, 2014, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the
2
3 Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to the e-mail addresses
4 registered.
5
By: /s/ Sathya S. Gosselin
Sathya S. Gosselin
Antitrust Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel
HAUSFELD LLP
1700 K St. NW, Suite 650
Washington, DC 20006
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1175437.1
-4Case No. 09-cv-3329-CW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONCERNING DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?