O'Bannon, Jr. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al

Filing 203

Declaration of Tina K. Shah in Support of #200 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Confidential Trial Exhibits Second Declaration of Tina K. Shah In Support of Defendant NCAA's Administrative Moton to Seal Confidential Trial Exhibits filed byNational Collegiate Athletic Association. (Related document(s) #200 ) (Pomerantz, Glenn) (Filed on 6/11/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 James A. Lamberth (Ga. Bar No. 431851) TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 600 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 5200 Atlanta, Georgia 30308 Telephone: (404) 885-3000 Facsimile: (404) 885-3900 Email: james.lamberth@troutmansanders.com 5 Attorneys for Non-Party Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 8 9 EDWARD O’BANNON, et al., Case No. 4:09-CV-3329-CW 10 Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 13 14 15 NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION; COLLEGIATE LICENSING COMPANY; and ELECTRONIC ARTS INC., SECOND DECLARATION OF TINA K. SHAH IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT NCAA’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL CONFIDENTIAL TRIAL EXHIBITS Judge: Honorable Claudia Wilken Defendants. 16 17 18 I, TINA K. SHAH, declare and state as follows: 19 1. I am an Assistant General Counsel with Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. (“TBS, 20 Inc.”). I am over 18 years of age and competent to give this declaration. The following facts are 21 based on my personal knowledge. 22 2. This declaration supplements the declaration I submitted on June 9, 2014 in 23 support of the Defendant National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”)’s Administrative 24 Motion to Seal Confidential Trial Exhibits. This second declaration responds to the Plaintiffs’ 25 opposition to the NCAA’s motion to seal. In their opposition brief, Plaintiffs identify specific 26 provisions of the the Multi-Media Agreement between TBS, Inc., CBS Broadcasting Inc. 27 (“CBS”), and the NCAA dated April 22, 2010 (the “Multi-Media Agreement”) and the the Digital 28 Rights Agreement between Turner Sports Interactive, Inc. and the NCAA dated August 23, 2010 SECOND DECLARATION OF TINA K. SHAH IN SUPPORT OF NCAA’S MOTION TO SEAL CASE NO. 4:09-CV-3329-CW 1 (the “Digital Rights Agreement”) that they seek to admit on the public record in this case. I 2 understand that the Plaintiffs are not seeking to disclose any other previously sealed or redacted 3 provisions of the Multi-Media Agreement or the Digital Rights Agreement in the versions of 4 those agreements used at trial. As I explained in my first declaration dated June 9, 2014, those 5 redacted provisions of the Multi-Media Agreement and the Digital Rights Agreement were 6 heavily negotiated by TBS, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries or affiliates and contain competitively 7 sensitive information, and they should remain redacted from any publicly filed versions of those 8 agreements. In this declaration, I focus specifically on certain provisions of the Multi-Media 9 Agreement on which the parties have been unable to agree with respect to disclosure. 10 3. Specifically, the “Definitions” in Section 1 of the Multi-Media Agreement include 11 certain terms that are specific to the Multi-Media Agreement and which were heavily negotiated 12 by the parties and contain competitively sensitive information. In particular, the terms “(g) 13 Broadcaster Multi-Sport Package” and “(h) Broadcaster Platform” are non-standard definitions 14 that describe aspects of the scope of the broadcasting rights and restrictions on those rights that 15 were heavily negotiated by the parties. Disclosure of these definitions would reveal 16 competitively sensitive information to content providers and potential competitors and cause 17 competitive harm to TBS, Inc. 18 4. The “Broadcaster Rights and Restrictions” provisions in Section 2 of the Multi- 19 Media Agreement govern the scope of the broadcasters’ rights with respect to the telecast and 20 distribution of the NCAA Division I men’s basketball tournament. These provisions are not 21 standard contract provisions and were heavily negotiated by the parties, and their contents are 22 competitively sensitive to TBS, Inc. Disclosure of these specific terms will harm TBS, Inc. in 23 future contract negotiations for the distribution of similar sports content. Specifically, if the 24 provisions in Section 2 of the Multi-Media Agreement are publicly disclosed, other content 25 providers will use their knowledge of these provisions in their negotiations with TBS, Inc., 26 including by potentially demanding similar provisions in their own rights agreements with TBS, 27 Inc. Similarly, TBS, Inc.’s competitors will use their knowledge of these provisions to offer 28 similar provisions in their negotiations with content providers, undermining TBS, Inc.’s -2- SECOND DECLARATION OF TINA K. SHAH IN SUPPORT OF NCAA’S MOTION TO SEAL CASE NO. 4:09-CV-3329-CW 1 2 competitive position. 5. The “Promotional Inventory” provisions in Section 9.5 of the Multi-Media 3 Agreement govern promotional obligations, and they represent an important part of the value 4 provided in the agreement. These terms are not standard terms and were heavily negotiated by 5 the parties. Disclosure of these specific terms concerning promotional obligations will harm 6 TBS, Inc. in future contract negotiations for the distribution of similar sports content. 7 Specifically, if the provisions in Section 9.5 of the Multi-Media Agreement are publicly 8 disclosed, other content providers will use their knowledge of these provisions in their 9 negotiations with TBS, Inc., including by potentially demanding similar provisions in their own 10 rights agreements with TBS, Inc. Similarly, TBS, Inc.’s competitors will use their knowledge of 11 these provisions in their negotiations with content providers, undermining TBS, Inc.’s 12 competitive position. 13 6. Exhibit B to the Multi-Media Agreement (“NCAA Royalties”) describes the 14 amount of payments made by the parties and the schedule upon which those payments are made. 15 These issues were heavily negotiated by the parties. Although the Plaintiffs contend that the 16 NCAA has publicly disclosed the total amount of the payments it is owed under the Multi-Media 17 Agreement, the payment schedule is variable over time and the schedule of payments is 18 competitively sensitive information for TBS, Inc. Disclosure of the payment schedule will harm 19 TBS, Inc. in future contract negotiations for the distribution of similar sports content. 20 Specifically, if the terms of Exhibit B to the Multi-Media Agreement are publicly disclosed, other 21 content providers will learn what payment structure TBS, Inc. was willing to accept and use that 22 knowledge to their advantage when negotiating the payment terms of their own rights agreements 23 with TBS, Inc. Similarly, TBS, Inc.’s competitors will use their knowledge of the payment 24 structure to undermine TBS, Inc.’s competitive position. 25 7. While the NCAA also has sought to protect the Multi-Media Agreement and the 26 Digital Rights Agreement from public disclosure, TBS, Inc., as a telecaster, has different 27 competitive interests than the NCAA and would suffer different harm than the NCAA if the 28 competitively sensitive provisions of those agreements are disclosed. -3- SECOND DECLARATION OF TINA K. SHAH IN SUPPORT OF NCAA’S MOTION TO SEAL CASE NO. 4:09-CV-3329-CW I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is 2 true and correct. 3 4 Executed on June II, 2014. Tina K. Shah 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- SECOND DECLARATION OF TINA K. SHAH IN SUPPORT OF NCAA'S MOTION TO SEAL CASE NO. 4:09-CV-3329-CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?