O'Bannon, Jr. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al

Filing 60

Memorandum in Opposition re 56 MOTION to Extend All Deadlines Pending Determination on Motion to Consolidate Actions filed byNational Collegiate Athletic Association. (Wierenga, Robert) (Filed on 9/4/2009)

Download PDF
O'Bannon, Jr. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gregory L. Curtner (Pro Hac Vice) curtner@millercanfield.com Robert J. Wierenga (SBN183687) wierenga@millercanfield.com Kimberly K. Kefalas (Pro Hac Vice) kefalas@millercanfield.com Atleen Kaur (Pro Hac Vice) kaur@millercanfield.com MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND STONE, P.L.C. 101 North Main St., 7th Floor Ann Arbor, MI 48104 Telephone: (734) 663-2445 Facsimile: (734) 663-8624 Jason A. Geller (SBN168149) jgeller@longlevit.com Glen R. Olson (SBN111914) golson@longlevit.com LONG & LEVIT LLP 465 California Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 397-2222 Facsimile: (415) 397-6392 Attorneys for Defendant National Collegiate Athletic Association UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION EDWARD C. O'BANNON, JR., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION (a/k/a the "NCAA"), and COLLEGIATE LICENSING COMPANY, (a/k/a "CLC"). Defendants. Case No. 3:09-cv-03329 CW DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND ALL DEADLINES PENDING DETERMINATION ON MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE ACTIONS Judge: Hon. Claudia Wilken Date Complaint filed: July 21, 2009 DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND ALL DEADLINES Case No. 3:09-cv-03329-CW 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants National Collegiate Athletic Association and Collegiate Licensing Company hereby oppose Plaintiff's Joint Motion to Extend All Deadlines Pending Determination on Motion to Consolidate Actions, filed in this action on September 1, 2009. The bases for Defendants' opposition to Plaintiff's request for an extension of all deadlines is set forth in the Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Joint Motion to Extend All Deadlines Pending Determination on Motion to Consolidate Actions, filed on September 4, 2009 in Keller v. Electronic Arts, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:09-CV-1967-CW. Robert J. Wierenga, the filer of this Opposition, hereby attests that Peter M. Boyle concurs in the filing of this Opposition. CONCLUSION Defendants respectfully request that Plaintiffs' Motion to Extend All Deadlines Pending Determination on Motion to Consolidate be denied. Dated: September 4, 2009 By: /s/ Robert J. Wierenga Robert J. Wierenga (SBN 183687) MILLER, CANFIELD PADDOCK AND STONE Attorneys for Defendant NCAA Dated: September 4, 2009 By: /s/ Peter M. Boyle Peter M. Boyle (pro hac vice) KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP Attorneys for Defendant CLC DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND ALL DEADLINES Case No. 3:09-cv-03329-CW 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AALIB:566697.1\063863-00041 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on September 4, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification to the e-mail addresses registered and I hereby certify that I have mailed the foregoing document via the U.S. Postal Service to the following non-CM/ECF participant: Arthur N. Bailey Hausfeld LLP 44 Montgomery St., 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Tanya Chutkan Jack Simms Boise Schiller & Flexner LLP 5301 Wisconsin Ave., Suite 800 Washington DC 20015 By: /s/ Robert J. Wierenga Robert J. Wierenga (SBN 183687) MILLER, CANFIELD PADDOCK AND STONE Attorneys for Defendant NCAA DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND ALL DEADLINES Case No. 3:09-cv-03329-CW 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?