Woodard v. City of Menlo Park

Filing 144

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 139 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Exclusion of Evidence filed by Robert Lee Woodard, Ron Venzon, Motions terminated: 139 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Exclusion of Evidence filed by Robert Lee Woodard, Ron Venzon.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/14/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

PETER C. MEIER (SB# 179019)
[e-mail]
KRISTIN M. HALL (SB# 261187)
[e-mail]
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street
Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3441
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6
7
8
9
10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT LEE WOODARD
JOHN L. FLEGEL (57010)
NICOLAS A. FLEGEL (229360)
JORGENSON, SIEGEL,
MCCLURE & FLEGEL, LLP
1100 Alma Street, Suite 210
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
650/324-0227

12
13

Attorneys for Defendant
RON VENZON

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

OAKLAND DIVISION

17
18

Robert Lee Woodard,

19
20
21
22

CASE NO. C 09-3331 SBA

Plaintiff,
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE

vs.
City of Menlo Park, et al.,
Defendants.

23

Trial Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:

September 19, 2012
8:30 AM
One, Fourth Floor
Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong

24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 09-3331 SBA

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE

1

JOINT STIPULATION

2

In accordance with Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiff Robert Lee Woodard (“Plaintiff”) and

3

Defendant Ron Venzon (“Defendant”) (collectively, “the Parties”), agree and jointly stipulate that

4

neither party shall seek to admit as evidence at trial the written summaries of interviews

5

conducted by the Menlo Park Police Department regarding the events at issue in this lawsuit.

6

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, CONSENTED TO AND

7
8
9

AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Parties and their respective counsel shall not seek to admit as evidence at trial
the written summaries of interviews conducted by the Menlo Park Police

10

Department regarding the events at issue in this lawsuit, which are Bates numbered

11

as DEF 9 through DEF 14.

12

DATED: September 7, 2012

JORGENSON, SIEGEL
McCLURE & FLEGEL, LLP

13
14
By:

/s/ Nicolas A. Flegel
NICOLAS A. FLEGEL

15
16

Attorneys for Defendant
RON VENZON

17
18
19

In accordance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the above signatory attests that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory below.

20
21

DATED: September 7, 2012

22

PETER C. MEIER
KRISTIN M. HALL
PAUL HASTINGS LLP

23
By:

24
25

/s/ Kristin M. Hall
KRISTIN M. HALL

Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT LEE WOODARD

26
27
28

-1Case No. C 09-3331 SBA

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE

1
2

[ORDER
The Joint Stipulation that the Parties and their respective counsel shall not seek to admit as

3

evidence at trial the written summaries of interviews conducted by the Menlo Park Police

4

Department regarding the events at issue in this lawsuit, which are Bates numbered as DEF 9

5

through DEF 14, is hereby adopted by this Court.

6
7

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9

DATED: 9/14/12
THE HON. SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2Case No. C 09-3331 SBA

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE