City of Ann Arbor Employees' Retirement System v. Accuray Incorporated et al

Filing 146

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting 134 Motion for Attorney Fees and Expenses. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 In re ACCURAY INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 13 14 This Document Relates To: 15 ALL ACTIONS. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 4:09-cv-03362-CW CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER AWARDING LEAD COUNSEL ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES DATE: TIME: CTRM: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 635724_1 September 1, 2011 2:00 p.m. The Honorable Claudia Wilken 1 This matter having come before the Court on September 1, 2011, on the application of 2 counsel for the Lead Plaintiffs for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in the captioned 3 action, the Court, having considered all papers filed and proceedings conducted herein, having found 4 the settlement of this action to be fair, reasonable, and adequate and otherwise being fully informed 5 in the premises and good cause appearing therefore; 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 7 1. All of the capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in 8 the Stipulation of Settlement, dated as of April 27, 2011 (the “Stipulation”), and filed with the Court. 9 10 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this application and all matters relating thereto, including all Members of the Settlement Class who have not timely and validly 11 12 requested exclusion. 3. 13 The Court hereby awards Lead Counsel attorneys’ fees of 25% of the Settlement 14 Fund, plus reimbursement of litigation expenses in the amount of $284,279.23 together with the 15 interest earned thereon for the same time period and at the same rate as that earned on the Settlement 16 Fund until paid. The Court finds that the amount of fees awarded is appropriate and is fair and 17 reasonable under the “percentage-of-recovery” method given the substantial risks of non-recovery, 18 the time and effort involved, and the result obtained for the Settlement Class. See Vizcaino v. 19 20 Microsoft Corp., 290 F.3d 1043 (9th Cir. 2002). 4. 21 The fees shall be allocated among counsel for the plaintiffs by Lead Counsel in a 22 manner that reflects each such counsel’s contribution to the institution, prosecution, and resolution of 23 the captioned action. 24 25 5. The awarded attorneys’ fees and expenses and interest earned thereon shall immediately be paid to Lead Counsel subject to the terms, conditions, and obligations of the 26 Stipulation, and in particular ¶7.2 thereof, which terms, conditions, and obligations are incorporated 27 28 635724_1 herein. [PROPOSED] ORDER AWARDING LEAD COUNSEL ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES - 4:09-cv-03362-CW -1- 1 6. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §78u-4(a)(4), Lead Plaintiff Zhengxu He is hereby awarded 2 $346.72. Such reimbursement is appropriate considering Lead Plaintiff’s participation in the 3 4 ongoing prosecution of the litigation and the evidentiary support presented. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 12/8/2011 DATED: ____________________ 7 THE HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Submitted by: ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP SHAWN A. WILLIAMS DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM Post Montgomery Center One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP JOY ANN BULL 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 s/ Joy Ann Bull JOY ANN BULL 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619/231-1058 619/231-7423 (fax) LABATON SUCHAROW LLP CHRISTOPHER J. KELLER JONATHAN GARDNER MARK GOLDMAN CAROL C. VILLEGAS 140 Broadway New York, NY 10005 Telephone: 212/907-0700 212/818-0477 (fax) Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs 28 635724_1 [PROPOSED] ORDER AWARDING LEAD COUNSEL ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES - 4:09-cv-03362-CW -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?