Baird v. Chiang et al

Filing 29

ORDER re 27 granting STIPULATION to Continue Hearing. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/29/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 William M. Audet (CA State Bar #117456) waudet@audetlaw.com Adel Nadji (CA State Bar #232599) anadji@audetlaw.com Jonas P. Mann (CA State Bar #263314) jmann@audetlaw.com AUDET & PARTNERS, LLP 221 Main Street, Suite 1460 San Francisco CA 94105 Telephone: 415.568-2555 Facsimile: 415.568.2556 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Proposed Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NANCY BAIRD, on behalf of herself and all ) Case No.: 4:09-cv-03482-CW others similarly situated, ) ) STIPULATION TO CONTINUE Plaintiff, ) HEARING vs. ) ) JOHN CHIANG, State Controller of the State ) of California, and WILLIAM LOCKYER, ) Treasurer of the State of California, ) ) Defendants ) ) ) WHEREAS, the Court, on its own motion, shall take Defendants' motion to dismiss under submission on the papers; and WHEREAS, the parties require more time to prepare opposition and reply papers; The parties agree Plaintiffs opposition will be due January 22, 2010 and Defendants' reply will be due January 30, 2010. SO STIPULATED. Dated: December 18, 2009 /s/ William M. Audet William M. Audet Audet & Partners, LLP Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Tamar Pachter Tamar Pachter Deputy Attorney General Government Law Section California Department of Justice Attorney for Defendants 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING Dated: December 18, 2009 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 12/29 Dated: __________________, 2009 ORDER The deadline to file opposition papers to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is extended to January 22, 2010 and Defendants' reply is due on January 30, 2010. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Hon. Claudia Wilken United States District Judge 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?