Klausner v. Lucas Film Entertainment Company LTD et al

Filing 34

ORDER re 33 Granting Stipulation Changing Expert Discovery Deadlines. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/27/2010. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ROBERT M. LIEBER, ESQ. SBN: 039976 NAKI M. IRVIN, ESQ. SBN: 094120 MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP 601 Montgomery Street, Suite 2030 Telephone: (415) 986-2144 Facsimile: (415) 986-4461 Email: rlieber@winlaw.com nakim@winlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant INDUSTRIAL LIGHT AND MAGIC, a division of LUCASFILM ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY LTD. ANDREW F. PIERCE, ESQ. SBN: 101889 STACY NORTH, ESQ. SBN: 219034 PIERCE & SHEARER LLP 2483 E. Bayshore Road, Suite 202 Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 843-1900 Facsimile: (650) 843-1999 Email: apierce@pierceshearer.com stacy@pierceshearer.com Attorneys for Plaintiff DREW KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION DREW KLAUSNER; Plaintiff, v. INDUSTRIAL LIGHT AND MAGIC, a division of LUCASFILM ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY LTD. and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. CV 09-03502-CW STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES & [PROPOSED] ORDER; DECLARATION OF NAKI M. IRVIN [Civ. L.R. 6-2] 26 27 28 MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW -------------------601 MONTGOMERY STREET SUITE 2030 SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 94111 Action Filed: July 30, 2009 Trial Date: April 11, 2011 Printed on Recycled Paper STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES Case No. CV 09-03502-CW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW -------------------601 MONTGOMERY STREET SUITE 2030 SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 94111 STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's Case Management Order dated December 1, 2009 (docket no. 21), the deadline to disclose the identities and reports of expert witnesses in this case is June 18, 2010, and the deadline to complete expert discovery is July 19, 2010; WHEREAS, the trial of this action is not scheduled to begin until April 11, 2011; WHEREAS, fact discovery is not scheduled to be completed until June 18, 2010; WHEREAS, the parties' expert witnesses cannot prepare complete reports of all their opinions in this matter until after they have had an opportunity to review fact discovery; WHEREAS, there have been no previous time modifications in this case; WHEREAS, continuing the expert discovery deadlines would not delay the trial date or otherwise affect the schedule for this case; THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties to this action, by and through their counsel of record, do HEREBY STIPULATE AND REQUEST THE COURT TO ORDER as follows: (1) The deadline to disclose the identities and reports of expert witnesses is extended from June 18, 2010 to August 31, 2010; and (2) The deadline to complete expert discovery is extended from July 19, 2010 to October 1, 2010. // // // // // // // // 1 _________________________________________ Printed on Recycled Paper STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES Case No. CV 09-03502-CW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW -------------------601 MONTGOMERY STREET SUITE 2030 SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 94111 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: May 19, 2010 MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP By: /s/ Naki M. Irvin NAKI M. IRVIN Attorneys for Defendant INDUSTRIAL LIGHT AND MAGIC, a division of LUCASFILM ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY LTD. DATED: May 19, 2010 PIERCE & SHEARER LLP By: /s/ Stacy North STACY NORTH Attorneys for Plaintiff DREW KLAUSNER [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. (1) The deadline to disclose the identities and reports of expert witnesses is extended from June 18, 2010 to August 31, 2010; and (2) The deadline to complete expert discovery is extended from July 19, 2010 to October 1, 2010. 5/27/2010 DATED: _______________ __________________________________ HON. CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Court Judge 2 _________________________________________ Printed on Recycled Paper STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES Case No. CV 09-03502-CW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MARGOLIS & TISMAN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW -------------------601 MONTGOMERY STREET SUITE 2030 SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 94111 DECLARATION OF NAKI M. IRVIN I, Naki M. Irvin, declare as follows: 1. 1. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth below. I am a partner with Margolis & Tisman LLP, which is counsel of record in this action for Defendant Industrial Light & Magic, a division of Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. ("Defendant"). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), I am making this declaration to accompany the parties' stipulated request for an order changing the expert discovery deadlines in this case. 2. The reason for the requested enlargement of time is that the expert witnesses cannot prepare complete reports of all their opinions in this matter until after they have had an opportunity to review fact discovery. Pursuant to the Court's December 1, 2009 Case Management Order (docket no. 21), fact discovery is not scheduled to be completed until June 18, 2010. 3. 4. There have been no prior time modifications in this case. The requested time modification will not delay the trial, which is not scheduled to begin until April 11, 2010, or otherwise affect the schedule for this case. I declare, under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States, that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed this 19th day of May, 2010, at San Francisco, California. /s/ Naki M. Irvin NAKI M. IRVIN 3 _________________________________________ Printed on Recycled Paper STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINES Case No. CV 09-03502-CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?