Taragan et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al

Filing 73

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 72 Continuing Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to First Amended Complaint filed by Nissan North America, Inc., Helen Taragan, Marites Asido, Matthew Wakefield, Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 11/9/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2012)

1

3

John H. Beisner, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Jessica Davidson Miller, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
1440 New York Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20005

4

Attorneys for Defendants

5

12

Elizabeth J. Cabraser (SBN 083151)
Scott P. Nealey (SBN 193062)
Jahan C. Sagafi (SBN 224887)
Joseph P. Forderer (SBN 278774)
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

13

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and proposed Class Members

2

6
7
8
9
10
11

14

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

15
16
17
18
19

HELEN TARAGAN, MATTHEW
WAKEFIELD, and MARITES ASIDO, on
behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

20
21

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., a
California corporation; NISSAN MOTOR
COMPANY, LTD., a Japanese company

STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING DEADLINE TO ANSWER
OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
AND EQUITABLE RELIEF

v.

22

CASE NO. CV-09-03660 (SBA)

23
24

Judge: The Hon. Sandra Brown Armstrong
Action Filed: August 10, 2009

Defendants.

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
AND EQUITABLE RELIEF
CASE NO. CV-09-03660 (SBA)

1

WHEREAS, there have been no previous extensions to defendant Nissan North

2

America, Inc.’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint in the

3

above-captioned matter;

4
5

WHEREAS, plaintiffs’ 109-paragraph First Amended Complaint includes new
allegations;

6
7

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants has a scheduling conflict due to the press of
other previously pending matters;

8
9

WHEREAS, this extension will not have any effect on any deadline set by the
Court in this case;

10
11

WHEREAS, counsel for the parties are otherwise diligently working to move the
case forward;

12

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES, pursuant to

13

L.R. 6-1(a), that defendant Nissan North America, Inc.’s time to answer or otherwise respond to

14

the First Amended Complaint in the above-captioned matter shall be extended until November

15

27, 2012.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
AND EQUITABLE RELIEF
CASE NO. CV-09-03660 (SBA)

1

Dated: November 8, 2012

2

Respectfully submitted,
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP

3
By:

/s/ John H. Beisner
John H. Beisner

4
5

7

John H. Beisner, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Jessica Davidson Miller, Esq. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
1440 New York Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20005

8

Attorneys for Defendants

6

9
10
11

Dated: November 8, 2012

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
By:

/s/ Jahan C. Sagafi
Jahan C. Sagafi

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Elizabeth J. Cabraser (SBN 083151)
Scott P. Nealey (SBN 193062)
Jahan C. Sagafi (SBN 224887)
Joseph P. Forderer (SBN 278774)
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and proposed Class Members

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
AND EQUITABLE RELIEF
CASE NO. CV-09-03660 (SBA)

1

ORDER

2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that defendant Nissan

4

North America, Inc.’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in the above-

5

captioned matter is extended until November 27, 2012.

6
7
8

Dated: November 9, 2012

By:
Saundra Brown Armstrong
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND
TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES
AND EQUITABLE RELIEF
CASE NO. CV-09-03660 (SBA)