Taragan et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al

Filing 81

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 75 MOTION to Dismiss . Responses due by 12/21/2012. Replies due by 1/15/2013.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 12/6/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2012)

1

7

Elizabeth J. Cabraser (SBN 083151)
Scott P. Nealey (SBN 193062)
Jahan C. Sagafi (SBN 224887)
Joseph P. Forderer (SBN 278774)
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

8

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and proposed Class Members

9

John H. Beisner (admitted pro hac vice)
Jessica D. Miller (admitted pro hac vice)
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER
& FLOM LLP
1440 New York Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6

10
11
12
13
14

Counsel For Defendant Nissan North America, Inc.
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
OAKLAND DIVISION
18
19
20
21

HELEN TARAGAN, FRANCES
JEANETTE TAYLOR, and CLARENCE
TAYLOR, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,

Case No. C-09-03660 SBA
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING BRIEFING DEADLINES

Plaintiffs,

22
23

v.

24

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., a
California corporation; and NISSAN
MOTOR COMPANY, LTD., a Japanese
company

25
26

Defendants.
27
28
1069060.1

CASE NO. C-09-03660 SBA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING DEADLINES

1

WHEREAS, Nissan North America, Inc. (“Nissan”) filed a Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’

2

First Amended Complaint (the “Motion”) on November 27, 2012, setting a hearing date of

3

January 29, 2013;

4

WHEREAS, under the Local Rules and as stated in the text of Docket No. 75, Plaintiffs’

5

response (the “Opposition”) is due by December 11, 2012, and Nissan’s reply (the “Reply”) is

6

due by December 18, 2012;

7
8

WHEREAS, counsel for both Plaintiffs and Nissan have scheduling conflicts due to the
press of other previously pending matters and vacations; and

9

WHEREAS, a brief extension of both deadlines will allow the parties additional time to

10

complete the briefing while ensuring that briefing is completed 14 days before the scheduled

11

hearing.

12

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their

13

Opposition is hereby extended to December 21, 2012, and Nissan’s deadline to file its Reply is

14

January 15, 2012.

15
16

Dated: December 3, 2012

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP

17
18

/s/ Jahan C. Sagafi
Jahan C. Sagafi

19

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and proposed Class

20
21

Dated: December 3, 2012

22

SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
/s/ John H. Beisner
John H. Beisner

23

Attorneys for Defendant

24
25
26
27
28
1069060.1

-1-

CASE NO. C-09-03660 SBA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING DEADLINES

1

ORDER

2

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
Dated: December 6, 2012
5

__________________________________
The Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong
United States District Court

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1069060.1

-2-

CASE NO. C-09-03660 SBA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING DEADLINES