Lemus v. Holder et al

Filing 8

ORDER re 7 granting STIPULATION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/5/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332 United States Attorney JOANN M. SWANSON, CSBN 88143 Chief, Civil Division EDWARD A. OLSEN, CSBN 214150 Assistant United States Attorney 1301 Clay Street, Suite 340S Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 637-3697 FAX: (510) 637-3724 Attorneys for Respondents UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) ERIC HOLDER, Attorney General of the ) United States; CHARLES DEMORE, ) Acting District Director, San Francisco ) Office, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ) Service, ) ) Respondents. ) ) ) ERIKA LEMUS No. C 09-3680-CW STIPULATION TO DISMISS; AND ORDER The petitioner, by and through her attorney, and respondents, by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to dismissal of the above-entitled proceeding in light of the fact that the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) has issued a decision on her motion to reopen her removal proceedings. The relief requested in the habeas petition ­ a stay of removal pending a decision by the BIA on the petitioner's motion to reopen ­ is no longer necessary. Each of the parties shall bear their own costs and fees. // // STIPULATION TO DISMISS C 09-3680-CW -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: October 1, 2009 Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s/ EDWARD A. OLSEN Assistant United States Attorney Dated: October 1, 2009 /s/ FRANK SPROULS Attorney for Petitioner ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: October ___, 2009 _________________________________ CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge STIPULATION TO DISMISS C 09-3680-CW -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?