Brantley et al v. Maxwell-Jolly et al
Filing
359
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 357 Stipulation, filed by Toby Douglas, Allie Jo Woodard, Department of Health Care Services, Jessie Jones, Esther Darling, Raif Nasyrova, Gilda Garcia, Wendy Helfrich. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 10/20/11. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
SUSAN M. CARSON
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 135875
JOSHUA N. SONDHEIMER
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 15200
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 703-5580
Fax: (415) 703-5480
E-mail: susan.carson@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
ESTHER DARLING; RONALD BELL by
his guardian ad litem Rozene Dilworth;
GILDA GARCIA; WENDY HELFRICH by
her guardian ad litem Dennis Arnett;
JESSIE JONES; RAIF NASSYROV by his
guardian ad litem Sofiya Nasyrova; ALLIE
JO WOODARD, by her guardian ad litem
Linda Gaspard-Berry; individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
18
19
v.
20
21
22
C09-03798 SBA
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
Date:
November 8, 2011
Time:
1:00 p.m.
Plaintiffs, Courtroom: 1, 4th Floor
Judge:
Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong
Trial Date: Not Set
Action Filed: August 18, 2009
TOBY DOUGLAS, Director of the
Department of Health Care Services, State
of California, DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH CARE SERVICES,
23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’
THIRD MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (C09-03798 SBA)
1
Given that the parties are actively involved in settlement negotiations with another session
2
to discuss settlement tomorrow, October 21st – the date defendants’ supplemental brief is
3
currently due -- the parties hereby stipulate to the following changes to the supplemental briefing
4
schedule for plaintiffs’ third motion for preliminary injunction:
5
1.
Defendants’ supplemental brief will be due on Tuesday, October 25th by 5:00 pm.
6
2.
Plaintiffs’ supplemental brief in reply will be due October 31st by 9:00 am.
7
3.
The hearing date for plaintiffs’ third motion for preliminary injunction will still be
8
held on Tuesday, November 8th at 1:00 pm.
9
Dated: October 20, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
10
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
11
12
/s/ Susan M. Carson
.
SUSAN M. CARSON
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
13
14
15
ELISSA GERSHON
DISABILITY RIGHTS CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
/s/ Elissa Gershon
Elissa Gershon
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
19
.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’
THIRD MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (C09-03798 SBA)
1
ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, IT IS SO ORDERED:
3
Defendants’ supplemental brief regarding plaintiffs’ third motion for preliminary injunction
4
must be filed by October 25th at 5:00 p.m. Plaintiffs’ reply must be filed by Monday, October
5
31st at 9:00 a.m. The hearing on the motion will still be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2011 at
6
1:00 p.m.
7
Dated: October 20, 2011
8
___________________________________
The Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong
United States District Court Judge
9
10
11
GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION
12
13
I, Susan M. Carson, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
14
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE SUPPLEMENTAL
15
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
16
INJUNCTION. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Elissa Gershon
17
has concurred in the filing of this document.
18
/s/ Susan M. Carson
Susan M. Carson
19
.
20
21
SF2009404616
20544108.doc
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’
THIRD MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (C09-03798 SBA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?