Brantley et al v. Maxwell-Jolly et al

Filing 406

Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Portions of Declarations (Dkt. No. 391). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 11/3/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF DECLARATIONS (Dkt. No. 391) Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 13 No. Civ. 09-3798 JSC ESTHER DARLING, et al., TOBY DOUGLAS, et al., Defendants. 14 / 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Now pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ “Motion for Further Proceedings Regarding Motion to Compel; Motion to Strike.” (Dkt. No. 391.) For the reasons explained at oral argument on November 3, 2011, Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs' argument goes to the weight the district court should give to the declaration statements in considering Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction rather than admissibility. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 3, 2011 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?