Brantley et al v. Maxwell-Jolly et al

Filing 406

Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Portions of Declarations (Dkt. No. 391). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 11/3/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF
DECLARATIONS (Dkt. No. 391)

Plaintiffs,

11

v.

12
13

No. Civ. 09-3798 JSC

ESTHER DARLING, et al.,

TOBY DOUGLAS, et al.,
Defendants.

14

/

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Now pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ “Motion for Further Proceedings
Regarding Motion to Compel; Motion to Strike.” (Dkt. No. 391.) For the reasons explained
at oral argument on November 3, 2011, Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED without prejudice.
Plaintiffs' argument goes to the weight the district court should give to the declaration
statements in considering Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction rather than
admissibility.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 3, 2011

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE