Gofron et al v. Picsel Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 62

ORDER Re: Authorizing Service of Process on Defendants Picsel Technologies, Inc., Through the California Secretary of State. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 11/30/2010. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2010)

Gofron et al v. Picsel Technologies, Inc. et al

Doc. 62

CRAIG A. MARR ( Illinois Bar No. 6271665) [e-mail] ATTORNEY AT LAW 33 W. Ontario Street, Suite 40-B Chicago, Illinois 60654 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] (pro hac vice) STAN S. MALLISON (Bar No. 184191) [e-mail] HECTOR R. MARTINEZ (Bar No. 206336) [e-mail] JESSICA JUAREZ (Bar No. 269600) [e-mail] MALLISON & MARTINEZ 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 730 Oakland, California 94612-3547 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ OAKLAND DIVISION CARRIE GOFRON, J. WILLIAM VANKE, ASHWINI KUMAR, MATTHEW MIXON, AND DULCE GONZALEZ Plaintiff, vs. MASOOD JABBAR, IMRAN KHAND, et al. Defendant. Case No. 4:09-CV-04041-CW [proposed] ORDER RE: AUTHORIZING SERVICEOF PROCESS ON DEFENDANT PICSEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., THROUGH THE CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 1702(a) AND CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 416.10 (a)-(c) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

Dockets.Justia.com

The Court, having reviewed Plaintiffs' affidavit and support documentation, finds that Plaintiffs have established that process against Defendant Picsel Technologies, Inc. (PTI), cannot be served with reasonable diligence under California Code of Civil Procedure sections 416.10(a)-(c). Wherefore, the Court hereby authorizes service of process to be performed on PTI through the office of the California Secretary of State. Service in this matter is deemed complete on the 10th day after delivery of the process to the Secretary of State. IT IS SO ORDERED. 30 Dated: November ___, 2010 ________________________ CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge