Gofron et al v. Picsel Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 83

ORDER CONCERNING PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANT DEFENDANT PICSEL HOLDINGS LIMITEDS 12(B)(2) MOTION TO DISMISS, DEFENDANT PICSEL GROUP HOLDINGS LIMITEDS12(B)(2) MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DEFENDANTS MASOOD JABBAR AND IMRAN KHANDS MOTION FOR PAR TIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Case Management Statement due by 6/16/2011. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/23/2011 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Motion Hearing set for 6/23/2011 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland before Hon. Claudia Wilken. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 5/14/2011. (cwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2011)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8
9

No. C 09-04041 CW
CARRIE GOFRON, J. WILLIAM VANKE,
ASHWINI KUMAR, MATTHEW MIXON and
DULCE GONZALEZ,
Plaintiffs,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

v.
PICSEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; PICSEL
HOLDINGS LIMITED, formerly known as
HAMSARD LIMITED; PICSEL GROUP
HOLDINGS LIMITED; MASOOD JABBAR; and
IMRAN KHAND,
Defendants.

15

/

16
17

ORDER CONCERNING
PLAINTIFFS’
OPPOSITIONS TO
DEFENDANT PICSEL
HOLDINGS LIMITED’S
12(B)(2) MOTION TO
DISMISS, DEFENDANT
PICSEL GROUP
HOLDINGS LIMITED’S
12(B)(2) MOTION TO
DISMISS, AND
DEFENDANTS MASOOD
JABBAR AND IMRAN
KHAND’S MOTION FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

Defendants Picsel Holdings Limited and Picsel Group Holdings

18

Limited have filed separate motions to dismiss for lack of personal

19

jurisdiction.

20

for partial summary judgment.

21

on June 2, 2011.

22

Gofron, et al.’s oppositions to these motions were due May 12,

23

2011.

Defendants Masood Jabbar and Imran Khand have moved
These motions were set for hearing

Under Civil L.R. 7-3(a), Plaintiffs Carrie

24

No opposition was received.
Plaintiffs’ oppositions to these motions shall be due May 19,

25

2011.

26

their respective motions shall be due seven days thereafter.

27

hearing on the motions and the further case management conference

28

set for June 2, 2011 are continued to June 23, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.

If oppositions are filed, Defendants’ replies in support of
The

1

Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with this Order will result in

2

the dismissal of their claims against Picsel Holdings Limited and

3

Picsel Group Holdings Limited and may result in the entry of

4

partial summary judgment in favor of Jabbar and Khand on the claims

5

at issue in their motion.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated: May 14, 2011
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2