Seagate Technology LLC et al v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA et al

Filing 18

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING 12 Stipulation selecting Mediation. Case referred to MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken, on 12/10/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2009) Modified on 12/11/2009 (jlm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 954-4400 Mary E. McCutcheon (State Bar No. 099939) mmccutcheon@fbm.com Tyler C. Gerking (State Bar No. 222088) tgerking@fbm.com Brett R. Wheeler (State Bar No. 260714) bwheeler@fbm.com Farella Braun & Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 Attorneys for Plaintiffs SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, SEAGATE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS PTE LTD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, a Delaware corporation, SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, a Cayman Islands Company; SEAGATE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS PTE LTD, a Singapore corporation, Plaintiffs, vs. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, a Pennsylvania corporation; INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, a Pennsylvania corporation, Defendants. Case No. 4:09-cv-04120-CW STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Date: Time: Judge: Courtroom: Complaint Filed: December 15, 2009 2:00 p.m. Hon. Claudia Wilken 2 September 4, 2009 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. CV-09-4120-CW 23143\2099818.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 954-4400 The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: ___ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) ___ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) X Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: ___ Private ADR (please identify process and provider)_________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ___ the presumptive deadline (the deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.) X other requested deadline: The parties jointly request a deadline of March 31, 2010 for completion of mediation. FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP Dated: November 24, 2009 I represent that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory, which shall serve in lieu of her signature on this document. By: /s/ Tyler C. Gerking Tyler C. Gerking Attorneys for Plaintiffs SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, SEAGATE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS PTE LTD Dated: November 24, 2009 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP By: /s/ Rebecca R. Weinreich Rebecca R. Weinreich Attorneys for Defendants NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. CV-09-4120-CW -2- 23143\2099818.1 12/10/09 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Farella Braun + Martel LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 954-4400 ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: ___ Non-binding Arbitration ___ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) ___X Mediation ___ Private ADR Deadline for ADR session ___ 90 days from the date of this order. ___ X Other __3-31-10______________________ IT IS SO ORDERED. 12/10/09 Dated:________________ _____________________________________ CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS CASE NO. CV-09-4120-CW -3- 23143\2099818.1 12/10/09

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?