Wendell et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Filing
228
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 220 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Responses due by 4/23/2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/12/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
STEPHEN WENDELL & LISA WENDELL,
as successors in interest to MAXX
WENDELL, deceased,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Plaintiffs,
v.
No. C 09-04124 CW
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO FILE
A MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
(Docket No. 220)
JOHNSON & JOHNSON; CENTOCOR,
INC.; ABBOTT LABORATORIES;
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM d/b/a
GLAXOSMITHKLINE; TEVA
PHARMACEUTICALS USA; GATE
PHARMACEUTICALS, a division of
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA; PAR
PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,
Defendants.
________________________________/
18
19
Having considered Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a
20
motion for reconsideration, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 7-
21
9(a), and Defendants’ oppositions, the Court grants the motion.
22
Docket No. 220.
23
the motion for reconsideration.
24
The Court deems Plaintiffs’ motion for leave as
If any Defendant wishes to file a
further opposition, it may do so within ten days in a brief not to
25
exceed eight pages.
To the extent possible, Defendants are
26
27
28
encouraged to consolidate any briefing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1
2
3
Dated:
4/12/2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?