Wendell et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al

Filing 228

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 220 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Responses due by 4/23/2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 4/12/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 STEPHEN WENDELL & LISA WENDELL, as successors in interest to MAXX WENDELL, deceased, United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiffs, v. No. C 09-04124 CW ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Docket No. 220) JOHNSON & JOHNSON; CENTOCOR, INC.; ABBOTT LABORATORIES; SMITHKLINE BEECHAM d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE; TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA; GATE PHARMACEUTICALS, a division of TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA; PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Defendants. ________________________________/ 18 19 Having considered Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a 20 motion for reconsideration, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 7- 21 9(a), and Defendants’ oppositions, the Court grants the motion. 22 Docket No. 220. 23 the motion for reconsideration. 24 The Court deems Plaintiffs’ motion for leave as If any Defendant wishes to file a further opposition, it may do so within ten days in a brief not to 25 exceed eight pages. To the extent possible, Defendants are 26 27 28 encouraged to consolidate any briefing. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 2 3 Dated: 4/12/2012 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?