Casissa v. First Republic Bank

Filing 107

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS 101 MOTION TO CONTINUE AND VACATING HEARING. 101 Motion TO CONTINUE AND VACATING HEARING set for 4/12/2012, is vacated. Responses due by 3/10/2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 3/6/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 FREDERICK J. CASSISSA, 5 6 7 No. C 09-4129 CW Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CONTINUE AND VACATING HEARING v. 8 FIRST REPUBLIC BANK, a division of MERRILL LYNCH BANK AND TRUST FSB; and DOES 1-20, 9 Defendants. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 ________________________________/ 11 ELIZABETH RIGGINS, 12 13 14 No. C 09-4130 CW Plaintiff, v. 15 FIRST REPUBLIC BANK, a division of MERRILL LYNCH BANK AND TRUST FSB; and DOES 1-20, 16 Defendants. 17 ________________________________/ 18 19 Defendant Bank of America, N.A., as successor in interest to 20 Merrill Lynch Bank and Trust FSB, has filed a motion to continue 21 the deadline for hearing dispositive motions or, in the 22 alternative, to continue the trial and reset the deadline for 23 hearing dispositive motions. 24 hearing on April 12, 2012 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-2. 25 However, as a motion to change time, Defendant’s motion is 26 governed by Civil Local Rule 6-3. 27 28 Defendant noticed this motion for 1 In accordance with Rule 6-3(c), Plaintiffs’ opposition, if 2 any, shall be filed within four days of the date of this Order. 3 The Court vacates the hearing currently set for April 12, 2012. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 Dated: 3/6/2012 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?