Bain et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al
Filing
48
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL TO FILE REGULAR STATUS REPORTS. Case Management Conference set for 10/10/2012 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 8/24/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
LISA BAIN, et al.,
5
6
7
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
13
ORDER DIRECTING
PLAINTIFFS’
COUNSEL TO FILE
REGULAR STATUS
REPORTS
Defendants.
________________________________/
LISA SAUNDERS, et al.,
11
12
No. C 09-4147 CW
No. C 09-4148 CW
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
________________________________/
16
KIMBERLY KESSLER, et al.,
17
18
19
No. C 09-4149 CW
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
20
Defendants.
21
________________________________/
22
DONALD BATES, et al.,
23
Plaintiffs,
24
25
26
27
28
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________________/
No. C 09-4150 CW
1
CAROLYN HARRISON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
2
3
4
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
Defendants.
5
6
7
________________________________/
CYNTHIA ARNOLD, et al.,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
13
________________________________/
ANGEL COLON, et al.,
16
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
________________________________/
TODD BOGGIS, et al.,
22
23
24
No. C 09-4159 CW
Plaintiffs,
20
21
No. C 09-4158 CW
Plaintiffs,
14
15
No. C 09-4157 CW
Plaintiffs,
8
9
No. C 09-4151 CW
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________________/
25
26
27
28
2
1
MARK COFFEY, et al.,
2
3
4
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
5
Defendants.
6
________________________________/
7
ANTONIO BURTON, et al.,
8
9
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 09-4161 CW
No. C 09-4162 CW
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
________________________________/
13
GLORIA MILLER, et al.,
14
15
16
No. C 09-4163 CW
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
________________________________/
19
DAVID MARTE, et al.,
20
21
22
23
24
No. C 09-4164 CW
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________________/
25
26
27
28
3
1
SHARON DISTON, et al.,
2
3
4
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
5
Defendants.
6
________________________________/
7
BONG NGYUEN, et al.,
8
9
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 09-4165 CW
No. C 09-4166 CW
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
________________________________/
13
DAMON BROWN, et al.,
14
15
16
No. C 10-0288 CW
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
________________________________/
19
DENNIS O’BRIEN, et al.,
20
21
22
23
24
25
No. C 10-0289 CW
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________________/
On February 18, 2011, in each of the above-captioned related
26
cases, the Court granted the parties’ stipulated motion to
27
establish a qualified settlement fund and appoint a fund
28
administrator.
Plaintiffs in some of the above captioned cases
4
1
(09-4150, 09-4151, 09-4159, 09-4162, 09-4163, 09-4164 and 09-4166)
2
are represented by the Mulligan Law Firm (hereinafter, the
3
Mulligan cases).
4
09-4148, 09-4149, 09-4157, 09-4158, 09-4161, 09-4165, 10-288 and
5
10-289) are represented by the Miller Firm (hereinafter, the
6
Miller cases).
7
Plaintiffs in the remaining cases (09-4147,
Subsequently, in the Mulligan cases, Plaintiffs’ counsel
8
informed the Court that certain Plaintiffs completed their
9
settlements with Defendants and filed stipulations of dismissal on
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
behalf of these Plaintiffs.
11
an order to show cause, the Court dismissed with prejudice the
12
claims brought by certain Plaintiffs who failed to keep in touch
13
with their counsel or to respond their counsel’s inquiries to
14
indicate whether they would or would not participate in the Master
15
Settlement Agreement (MSA) reached in these cases.
16
Plaintiffs remain in each of the Mulligan cases at this time.
17
In these cases as well, after issuing
Several
In the Miller cases, Plaintiffs’ counsel has not informed the
18
Court of the status of the parties’ settlement on behalf of any
19
Plaintiff since February 18, 2011.
20
Within two weeks of the date of this Order, in each of the
21
above-captioned matters, Plaintiffs’ counsel shall file a status
22
report indicating the status of each remaining Plaintiff.
23
table in the status report, counsel shall provide the following
24
information for each remaining Plaintiff:
25
(1)
In a
Whether the Plaintiff has resolved his or her claims,
26
including (a) by finalizing his or her participation in the MSA or
27
(b) by means other than the MSA; and
28
5
1
2
3
(2)
If the Plaintiff has not resolved his or her claims,
whether the Plaintiff intends to participate in or reject the MSA.
In the status report, counsel shall also identify any
4
Plaintiffs who have failed to respond to counsel’s efforts to
5
contact them in order to ascertain whether or not they will
6
participate in the MSA, and shall detail the efforts made to
7
contact them.
8
9
Within four weeks of the date of this Order, counsel shall
finalize settlements for any Plaintiffs who intend to participate
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
in the MSA.
11
resolved, Plaintiffs’ counsel shall within three days seek and
12
file a stipulation of dismissal as to that Plaintiff.
13
counsel shall notify the Court immediately when the claims of all
14
Plaintiffs in any of the above-captioned cases have been
15
dismissed.
16
When the claims of any individual Plaintiff have been
Plaintiffs’
A case management conference shall be held on October 10,
17
2012 at 2:00 p.m. to set dates regarding the claims made by all
18
Plaintiffs who remain on that date.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
22
Dated: 8/24/2012
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?