Bain et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al
Filing
79
ORDER Granting Stipulation as to Private Mediation with Previous Mediator. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/19/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PETER A. STROTZ, Bar No. 129904
pstrotz@kslaw.com
OLIVER Q. DUNLAP, Bar No. 225566
odunlap@kslaw.com
KING & SPALDING LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
415-318-1200
Facsimile:
415-318-1300
Attorneys for Defendant
ASTRAZENECA LP AND ASTRAZENECA
PHARMACEUTICALS LP
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
LISA BAIN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:09-cv-04147-CW
LISA SAUNDERS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:09-cv-04148-CW
KIMBERLY KESSLER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:09-cv-04149-CW
CYNTHIA ARNOLD, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:09-cv-04157-CW
27
28
1
PARTY STIPULATION AS TO PRIVATE MEDIATION WITH PREVIOUS MEDIATOR
DMSLIBRARY01-19958387.1
1
2
3
4
ANGEL COLON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:09-cv-04158-CW
MARK COFFEY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:09-cv-04161-CW
SHARON DISTON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:09-cv-04165-CW
DAMON BROWN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:10-cv-00288-CW
DENNIS O’BRIEN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:10-cv-00289-CW
DONALD BATES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:09-cv-04150- CW
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PARTY STIPULATION AS TO PRIVATE MEDIATION WITH PREVIOUS MEDIATOR
DMSLIBRARY01-19958387.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
CAROLYN HARRISON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:09-cv-04151- CW
TODD BOGGIS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:09-cv-04159- CW
ANTONIO BURTON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:09-cv-04162- CW
GLORIA MILLER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:09-cv-04163- CW
BONG NGUYEN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:09-cv-04166-CW
21
22
PARTY STIPULATION AS TO PRIVATE MEDIATION WITH PREVIOUS MEDIATOR
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
PARTY STIPULATION AS TO PRIVATE MEDIATION WITH PREVIOUS MEDIATOR
DMSLIBRARY01-19958387.1
1
Pursuant to the Court’s December 14, 2012 Order, the parties hereby stipulate to private
2
mediation with the previous mediator, if necessary, to address the claims made by plaintiff Eric
3
Negray and any other plaintiffs who may wish to proceed with litigation in the above titled cases.
4
Specifically, the parties stipulate to such mediation before Professor Stephen Saltzburg,
5
likely at the offices of McCarter & English LLP, Renaissance Centre, 405 N. King St., 8th Flr.,
6
Wilmington, DE 19801, subject to Professor Saltzburg’s pending confirmation of his availability
7
and travel schedule.
8
9
DATED: December ___, 2012.
18
KING SPALDING LLP
10
By: /s/ Oliver Dunlap
PETER A. STROTZ
OLIVER Q. DUNLAP
Attorneys for Defendants
ASTRAZENECA LP AND
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS
LP
11
12
13
14
15
DATED: December ___, 2012.
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
16
By:
17
MICHAEL E. MOLLAND
AARON DUTRA
Attorneys for Defendant
MCKESSON CORPORATION
18
19
20
DATED: December ___, 2012.
THE MULLIGAN LAW FIRM
21
By:
22
ERIC W. GRUENWALD
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
PARTY STIPULATION AS TO PRIVATE MEDIATION WITH PREVIOUS MEDIATOR
DMSLIBRARY01-19958387.1
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
R NIA
S
UNIT
ED
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
en
A
H
LI
RT
ER
FO
NO
ia Wilk
laud
Judge C
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?