Bain et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al

Filing 93

ORDER Granting Outstanding Dismissals. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/13/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PETER A. STROTZ, Bar No. 129904
[e-mail]
OLIVER Q. DUNLAP, Bar No. 225566
[e-mail]
KING & SPALDING LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-318-1300
Attorneys for Defendant
ASTRAZENECA LP AND ASTRAZENECA
PHARMACEUTICALS LP

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

LISA BAIN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04147-CW

LISA SAUNDERS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04148-CW

KIMBERLY KESSLER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04149-CW

CYNTHIA ARNOLD, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04157-CW

27
28
1
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING OUSTANDING DISMISSALS
DMSLIBRARY01-20217325.1

1
2
3
4

ANGEL COLON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04158-CW

MARK COFFEY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04161-CW

SHARON DISTON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04165-CW

DAMON BROWN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:10-cv-00288-CW

DENNIS O’BRIEN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:10-cv-00289-CW

DONALD BATES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04150- CW

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING OUSTANDING DISMISSALS
DMSLIBRARY01-20217325.1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

CAROLYN HARRISON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04151- CW

TODD BOGGIS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04159- CW

PAUL TRIM, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04160-CW

ANTONIO BURTON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04162- CW

GLORIA MILLER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04163- CW

DAVID MARTE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04164-CW

25
26
27
28
3
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING OUSTANDING DISMISSALS
DMSLIBRARY01-20217325.1

1
2
3
4
5
6

BONG NGUYEN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ASTRAZENECA LP, et al.,
Defendants.

Case No. 4:09-cv-04166-CW

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING OUSTANDING DISMISSALS

7
8
9
10
11

WHEREAS this court has previously ORDERED on June 20, 2012 and October 30, 2012
the dismissal with prejudice of the cases of select non-responsive plaintiffs in the above-listed
actions for failure to prosecute their claims; and
WHEREAS the parties in the above-listed cases have filed various stipulated dismissals

12

and motions to withdraw seeking to resolve the cases of all but a handful of plaintiffs in the above

13

listed actions;

14

IT IS ORDERED, good cause existing, for the benefit of the Court, the parties, and

15

witnesses, in furtherance of the interest of justice, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

16

41(a)(1)(A)(ii) that all Stipulated Dismissals with Prejudice as to Certain Plaintiffs previously

17

filed by the parties in the above-listed actions are GRANTED. The claims of all plaintiffs in

18

these actions -- with the exception of those of Miller firm plaintiffs Annie Bootie (Case No. 4:09-

19

cv-04157), Bill Boury (Case No. 4:09-cv-04158), Daniel Anderson (Case No. 4:09-cv-04158),

20

Rosemary Camacho (Case No. 4:10-cv-00288), Eric Negray (Case No. 4:10-cv-00289), Sam

21

Sapienza (Case No. 4:09-cv-04148), Lynus Stewart (Case No. 4:10-cv-00289) and Miguel Porto

22

(Case No. 4:09-cv-04161), all of whom are still pending final resolution -- are hereby dismissed

23

with prejudice, thereby resolving these cases as to all plaintiffs except the eight noted above.

24
25

13
DATED: February ___, 2013.

26

By: _

_______________

Judge U.S. District Court
Northern District of California

27
28
4

[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING OUSTANDING DISMISSALS
DMSLIBRARY01-20217325.1

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2
I, the undersigned, certify and declare as follows:
3
4
5

I am employed in the County of Alameda, State of California. I am over the age of 18
years and am not a party to the within action. My business address is 101 Second Street, San
Francisco, California 94105.
On February 12, 2013, I served the following document(s) described as:

6
7
8
9
10



[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING OUSTANDING DISMISSALS

on all party(ies) in this action as follows:
 BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE: By transmitting via electronic transmission through the

United States District Court, Northern District of California's PACER filing system, the
document(s) listed above.

11
12

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above
is true and correct.

13
Executed on February 12, 2013, at San Francisco, California.
14
15

/s/ Diane Verduga
DIANE VERDUGA

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

6
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING OUSTANDING DISMISSALS
DMSLIBRARY01-20217325.1