Saunders et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al

Filing 94

ORDER Granting ( 93 in 4:09-cv-04148-CW, 103 in 4:09-cv-04157-CW, 96 in 4:09-cv-04158-CW, 87 in 4:10-cv-00288-CW and 94 in 4:10-cv-00289-CW) Proposed Order. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 7/1/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PETER A. STROTZ, Bar No. 129904 pstrotz@kslaw.com OLIVER Q. DUNLAP, Bar No. 225566 odunlap@kslaw.com KING & SPALDING LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 2300 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: 415-318-1200 Facsimile: 415-318-1300 Attorneys for Defendant ASTRAZENECA LP AND ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 LISA SAUNDERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASTRAZENECA LP, et al., Defendants. Case No. 4:09-cv-04148-CW CYNTHIA ARNOLD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASTRAZENECA LP, et al., Defendants. Case No. 4:09-cv-04157-CW ANGEL COLON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASTRAZENECA LP, et al., Defendants. Case No. 4:09-cv-04158-CW DAMON BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASTRAZENECA LP, et al., Defendants. Case No. 4:10-cv-00288-CW 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING OUTSTANDING DISMISSALS DMSLIBRARY01:21123896.1 1 2 3 4 DENNIS O’BRIEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ASTRAZENECA LP, et al., Defendants. Case No. 4:10-cv-00289-CW 5 6 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING OUTSTANDING DISMISSALS 7 WHEREAS the parties have previously filed stipulated dismissal with prejudice for 8 plaintiffs Annie Bootie (in Case No. 4:09-cv-04157-CW), Rosemary Camacho (in Case No. 4:10- 9 cv-00288-CW), Daniel Anderson and Bill Boury (in Case No. 4:09-cv-04158-CW), and Sam 10 Sapienza (in Case No. 4:09-cv-04148-CW) on March 14, 2013, as well as for plaintiff Eric Negray 11 (in Case No. 4:10-cv-00289-CW) on May 9, 2013; and 12 13 14 WHEREAS this court has previously ORDERED the dismissal with prejudice of similarly stipulated plaintiffs in the above-listed actions; IT IS ORDERED, good cause existing, for the benefit of the Court, the parties, and 15 witnesses, in furtherance of the interest of justice, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) that all Stipulated Dismissals with Prejudice as to Certain Plaintiffs previously filed 17 by the parties in the above-listed actions are GRANTED. Specifically, the claims of plaintiffs 18 Annie Bootie (in Case No. 4:09-cv-04157-CW), Rosemary Camacho (in Case No. 4:10-cv-00288- 19 CW), Daniel Anderson and Bill Boury (in Case No. 4:09-cv-04158-CW), Sam Sapienza (in Case 20 No. 4:09-cv-04148-CW) and Eric Negray (in Case No. 4:10-cv-00289-CW) are hereby dismissed 21 with prejudice, thereby resolving all the above cases. 22 23 July 1, 2013 DATED: June ___, 2013. 24 By:__________________________________ Judge U.S. District Court Northern District of California 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING OUTSTANDING DISMISSALS DMSLIBRARY01:21123896.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?