Bates et al v. AstraZeneca LP et al

Filing 39

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING UNOPPOSED (42) in case 4:09-cv-04162-CW; (41) in case 4:09-cv-04164-CW; (43) in case 4:09-cv-04166-CW; (38) in case 4:09-cv-04150-CW; (43) in case 4:09-cv-04159-CW; (41) in case 4:09-cv-04160-CW; (39) in case 4:09-cv-04163-CW MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASES SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 DONALD BATES, et al., No. C 09-4150 CW 5 Plaintiffs, ________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASES SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE CAROLYN HARRISON, et al., No. C 09-4151 CW 6 7 v. ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al., 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 Plaintiffs, v. ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ________________________________/ 16 TODD BOGGIS, et al., 17 18 19 No. C 09-4159 CW Plaintiffs, v. ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al., 20 Defendants. 21 ________________________________/ 22 PAUL TRIM, et al., 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs, v. ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al., Defendants. ________________________________/ No. C 09-4160 CW 1 ANTONIO BURTON, et al., 2 3 4 Plaintiffs, v. ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al., 5 Defendants. 6 ________________________________/ 7 GLORIA MILLER, et al., 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California No. C 09-4162 CW No. C 09-4163 CW Plaintiffs, v. ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 ________________________________/ 13 BONG NGYUEN, et al., 14 15 16 No. C 09-4166 CW Plaintiffs, v. ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 ________________________________/ 19 DAVID MARTIN, et al., 20 Plaintiffs, 21 22 23 24 No. C 09-4164 CW v. ASTRAZENECA, LP, et al., Defendants. ________________________________/ 25 26 27 28 2 1 Plaintiffs’ counsel moves for an order to show cause why 2 claims brought by certain Plaintiffs should not be dismissed with 3 prejudice. 4 Plaintiffs’ counsel represents that it has entered into a 5 Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) with Defendants as to all cases 6 involving Plaintiffs represented by Plaintiffs’ counsel. 7 Plaintiffs’ counsel has informed all such Plaintiffs of the MSA 8 and their right to participate in the settlement agreement 9 according to its terms. However, certain Plaintiffs, who are United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 listed in Exhibit A to Plaintiffs’ counsel’s motion, have failed 11 to respond to indicate whether they will or will not participate 12 in the MSA, and have failed to keep in contact with their counsel. 13 Having considered the papers filed by Plaintiffs’ counsel, 14 the Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS the Plaintiffs listed in 15 Exhibit A to show cause, within twenty-one days of the date of 16 this Order, why his or her case should not be dismissed with 17 prejudice. 18 appear before this Court on his or her behalf, or may communicate 19 with counsel regarding their agreement to the MSA. 20 admonished that if they fail to comply with the terms of this 21 order, their claims will be dismissed with prejudice. 22 Alternatively, these Plaintiffs may have new counsel Plaintiffs are Plaintiffs’ counsel is ORDERED to provide notice of this 23 Order to Plaintiffs listed in Exhibit A, based on the best 24 available contact information, and to file a certification that 25 such notice has been sent, with three days of the date of this 26 Order. 27 days from the date of this Order, a declaration stating whether Plaintiffs’ counsel is also ORDERED to file, in twenty-two 28 3 1 these Plaintiffs have since communicated with counsel regarding 2 their agreement to the MSA. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 Dated: 5/18/2012 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?