Hamilton v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 12

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/23/09. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-04152-JCS Document9 Filed11/20/09 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JOHN B. SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 96742) jbs@severson.com MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622) mdl@severson.com KALAMA M. LUI-KWAN (State Bar No. 242121) kml@severson.com SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 MARIKA HAMILTON, an individual, on her 13 own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated 14 Plaintiff, 15 V. 16 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 07685/0436/773302.1 Case No.: CV 09-04152 JCS CLASS ACTION STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT (L.R. 6-1(a)) STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT Case3:09-cv-04152-JCS Document9 Filed11/20/09 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 WHEREAS, on September 28, 2009, plaintiff Marika Hamilton ("Plaintiff") mailed the summons and complaint in this matter ("Complaint") to defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Defendant"); WHEREAS, Defendant has acknowledged receipt of the summons and Complaint; WHEREAS, Defendant's current deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is November 27, 2009; WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to extend the deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint; NOW THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that: 1. The time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended until and including December 11, 2009; and 2. all parties. DATED: November 20, 2009 KAMBEREDELSON, LLC By: /s/ Steven L. Lezell Steven L. Lezell This stipulation is without prejudice to the rights, claims, arguments and defenses of 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 07685/0436/773302.1 Attorneys for Plaintiff Marika Hamilton DATED: November 20, 2009 ISTRICT ES D UNIT ED Dated: 11/23/9 S T TA C SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation By: /s/ Kalama M. Lui-Kwan Kalama M. Lui-Kwan Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest E C F D I S T I C T O in the filing of the document has been obtained from under penalty of perjury that concurrence R RN Steven L. Lezell. A LI FO seph C Judge Jo . Spero R NIA DERED SO OR IT IS RT U O Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. NO RT H STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?